|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benjamin Twos |
|
|
Now I am one of those guys who like to have their cake and eat it (perhaps explains my weight?). I certainly like to be able to open a weak two in the majors, but I also like strong Acol type twos in the majors. Fortunately, this was all solved by Albert Benjamin. Playing Benjamin twos, the traditional 2♣ opening (22+ or a game forcing hand) is replaced by 2♦ . This then leaves 2♣ free to show a strong two in either major (partner normally relays with 2♦ and you then bid 2♥/♠ ). Now there are numerous variants as to exactly what the 2♣ and 2♦ opening bids (and subsequent rebids) mean. I shall simply describe my preferred Benjamin variation etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
2♣ |
= |
Strong but not game forcing. |
|
|
Either 8-9 playing tricks in an unspecified suit or a balanced 22-24. |
2♦ |
= |
Game forcing, 25+ if balanced. |
2♥/♠ |
= |
weak, 6 card suit, 6-10. |
2NT |
= |
20-21 balanced. |
3NT |
= |
pre-emptive (gambling 3NT); long solid minor, nothing outside. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
After a 2♣/♦ opening, I prefer an automatic relay of 2♦/♥ . Rebids then mean: - |
|
|
|
|
|
2♣ - 2♦ - 2♥/♠ |
8 playing tricks – non-forcing (but rarely passed). |
2♣ - 2♦ - 3♥/♠ |
9 playing tricks – non-forcing (but very rarely passed). |
2♣ - 2♦ - 3♣/♦ |
9 playing tricks – non-forcing (generally an unbalanced hand). |
2♣ - 2♦ - 2NT |
22-24, balanced – non-forcing. |
2♦ - 2♥ - 2NT |
25+, balanced, game forcing. |
2♦ - 2♥ - any suit |
natural, game forcing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As I said, there are numerous variants of Benjamin twos, but I prefer this one because you never have to bid 3NT (this leaves partner the option of Stayman and transfers etc. when he is bust and you are 25+). There is a rather better/more complex variant based on this scheme which also includes 4441 type hands. |
|
|
|
|
|
Note that a 2♦ opening is always game forcing; if balanced it is 25+. This really is better than havint to rebid 3NT as responder is able to use transfers/Stayman/Baron 3♣ whatever below the level of 3NT. |
|
|
|
|
|
Note also that an Acol two is normally forcing. Playing this version of Benjamin the sequence |
|
|
2♣ - 2♦ - 2♥/♠ is not forcing (but is rarely passed) as a stronger opening hand would rebid at the 3 level. |
|
|
The reason that this 2♥/♠ should rarely be passed is that responder needs very little to make game. Now you may think that he needs two tricks for game to make - but that is not so! It is all explained in my 'Playing tricks' article. Make sure to read the chapter on 'the problem with playing tricks'. |
|
|
|
|
|
Incidentally, Benjamin twos are normally associated with Acol – but there really is no dependence. You can play any variation of Benjamin twos with Standard American, 2/1 or any natural system. In fact I recommend it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pattaya Bridge Club - |
www.pattayabridge.com |
|
|
|
|
|