|
|
|
|
to news-sheet main page |
to Pattaya Bridge home page |
||
|
|
|
|
Mon 31st 1st N-S Bob & Jo 56% 2nd Dave & Neil 53%
1st E-W John & Kenneth 56% 2nd Paul Wijnbergen & Harry 54%
Wed 2nd 1st Bob & Eddie 55% 2nd Paul Scully & Dave 55%
Fri 4th 1st Gerry & Tony 60% 2nd Jim & Phil 54%
Bidding Quiz Standard American is assumed unless
otherwise stated.
♠ K765 ♠ AJ9
♥ AK753 ♥ 1086 With Hand B
LHO opens 1♥, partner bids 1♠ and
♠ J10872 ♠ QJ8
♦ 3 ♦ Q104 (b) Suppose you pass and this is passed round to partner who
♠ A106 ♠ QJ109
♥ J9874 ♥ KJ10 With Hand F LHO opens 1♦ and partner doubles.
♦ A854 ♦ 5 (a) What do you bid?
♠ K8 ♠ A752 (b) What if partner made a long pause?
♥ 4 ♥ AQ92
♠ AK9732 ♠ 3 With Hand K
partner opens 1♦ and
♥ 4 ♥ J862 do you do?
♦ 97 ♦ K862
♣ K965 ♣ 10542
The Unassuming Cue Bid – part 1 Board 1 from Friday 28th
Dealer: ♠ Q42 Table A
Love all ♦ A743 - 1♦ 1♠ 2♦ (1)
♣ AJ87 3♠ (2) pass pass (3) pass
♠ K765 N ♠ AJ1098 ‘Expert’ Table
♥ AK753 W E ♥ 104 West(A) North East South(K)
♠ 3
♥ J862
♦ K862
♣ 10542
The Unassuming Cue Bid – part 2 Board 7 from Monday 31st
Dealer: ♠ 2 Table A
Both vul ♦ J1093 - - - 1♥
♣ KQJ76 1♠ 2♥ 4♠ (1) all pass
♠ 1086543 N ♠ AJ9 ‘Expert’ Table
♥
♠ KQ7 3♠ (2) all pass
♥ AQ953
♦ 854
♣ 108
The Unassuming Cue Bid – part 3 Board 8 from Friday 4th
Dealer: ♠ 106 Table A
Both vul ♦ AJ865 pass (1) pass pass 1♥
♣ 874 1♠ 2♥ 3♠ (2) pass
pass (3) pass
♠ AK9732 N ♠ Q854
♥ 4 W E ♥ AJ65 ‘Expert’ Table
♠ J 1♠ 2♥ 3♥ (2) pass
♥ K10872 4♠ (4) all pass
♦ KQ42
♣ A32
The Unassuming Cue Bid – part 4 Board 11 from Friday 4th
There was yet another example of the Unassuming Cue Bid on Friday: -
Dealer: ♠ 532 Table A
Love all ♦ A9864 - - - pass
♣ A1032 pass 1♦ 1♥ pass
3♥ (1) pass pass (2) pass
♠ QJ7 N ♠ A106
♥ QJ84 W E ♥ A10975 ‘Expert’ Table
♠ K984 pass 1♦ 1♥ pass
♥ 632 2♦ (1) pass 4♥ (3) all pass
♦ 107
♣ Q975
Play the Unassuming Cue Bid!
Hanging Partner Board 8 from Monday 31st
Dealer: ♠ QJ8
Love all ♦ Q104 2♠ pass (1) pass dbl (2)
♣ K965 pass 3NT (3) pass 4♥ (4)
all pass
♠ K97432 N ♠ 5
♥ A32 W E ♥ 105
♠ A106
♥ J9874
♦ A854
♣ 2
The jump to 3NT when partner reverses Board 19 from Monday 31st
Dealer: ♠ J10872 Table A
E-W vul ♦ 3 - - - 1♦
♣ AK987 pass 1♠ pass 2♥ (1)
pass 3NT (2) pass 4NT (3)
♠ Q94 N ♠ 53 pass 5♦ (4) pass 5NT (5)
♥ 104 W E ♥ KJ975 pass 6♦ (6) pass 6♠
♠ AK6
♥ A862 Table B
♦ AK984 West North(C) East South
♣ Q pass 1♠ pass 2♥ (1)
pass 3NT (2) pass pass (3)
Double followed by a raise shows a strong hand Board 2 from Monday 31st
West was incorrectly criticised on this deal; everybody (except West) seems to be talking garbage in my opinion. And nobody picked up on what I think was possibly an inferior bid by West, but it’s marginal.
Dealer: ♠ 864
N-S vul ♦ 962 - - pass 1♦
♣ KQ75 dbl (1) pass 1♠ (2) pass
2♠ (2) pass pass (3) pass
♠ A752 N ♠ QJ109
♥ AQ92 W E ♥ KJ10
♠ K3
♥ 865
♦ KJ1073
♣ A63
- Upgrade (by a lot!) a hand with three tens, two nines and a useful singleton.
-
If you give a minimal response
of 1♥/♠ to a double by partner and he raises to 2♥/♠, then go
to game with 7-8 points. This is all very clearly defined on the web (Basic Bidding – doc No. 134).
-
Don’t criticise an opponent if
you don’t know what you are talking about.
Forced to pass after partner’s hesitation? Board 3 from Monday 31st
Dealer: ♠ 7543 The same set of players got it all
South ♥ AJ wrong on the very next board: -
E-W vul ♦ K32
♣ 10953
♠ AQ6 N ♠ K8 West North East(G) South
♥ Q73 W E ♥ 4 - - - pass (1)
♠ J1092
♥ K1098652
♦ J
♣ J
(1) South did not open 3♥ because had 4 ♠’s.
(2) So now the pre-empt implies a 4 card ♠ suit.
(3) After a very long pause.
(4) What did you bid with this East hand G in this week’s quiz? If you play negative doubles to this level then a re-opening double here is automatic. If you do not play negative doubles this high then I would still double (take-out). You most certainly do not want to sell out to 3♥ and I think that dbl is clear-cut. East passed because he thought that he was obliged to after partner’s long pause. He is not.
- Partner’s hesitation does NOT bar you from bidding. In this example, if E-W play negative doubles then East is OBLIGED to make the ‘automatic’ re-opening double. Otherwise the director may well give an adjusted score if E-W got a good result because there was no re-opening double.
- If you play negative doubles through to say 2♠ and the above situation occurs, then East has to think “what would 80% of the people of my standard do in this situation” and make a bid if he believed that 80% would. In my opinion 80% of people of this East’s standard would indeed have doubled.
A hat-trick - the same critical guys again. West hand 4 from Monday 31st
♦ AQ1032 ♦ 5 pass (2) pass
♣ J876 ♣ AQ9
(1) Quite why East rebid 2♣ I have no idea, I would bid a game forcing 3♣. Anyway, people at the table said that West should have bid 2♠ at (2). I don’t see why – it’s a ‘known’ 4-4 ♣ fit. False preference to 2♠ may be better at pairs scoring but I would certainly not criticise the pass. East should not have made a non-forcing ‘false’ bid with game values.
Bidding Quiz Answers
Hand A: 3♦. An Unassuming Cue Bid. You have a sound raise to 4♠ if partner has a decent overcall; but an
overcall may be as few as 7 points. So a cue bid of the opponents suit means
just that and enables partner to stop in 3♠
with a minimal overcall.
Hand B: 3♥.
Ditto
Hand C: 3NT. This shows about 8-11 points and ♣ stop(s). 2NT is wrong because it is not
forcing (it shows about 6-8) unless you play Lebensohl. With a slam seeking
hand you could always kick off with 4th suit forcing (3♣ - which is not natural).
Hand D: (a) Pass.
Nowhere near good enough for 1NT and far too flat for double.
(b) 2NT. Partner’s double is in the balancing seat
and he is not promising the usual 11+ points (only about 8+). When partner
balances you should deduct 3 points from your hand and reply accordingly.
Hand E: 2♥. Totally unsuitable for a double (because of the singleton ♣ and values in ♠’s). It’s very simple really – with a five card
major, bid it. Note that 8 points is OK for a 2-level overcall in the balancing
seat.
Hand F: (a) 2♠. 9-11 points, which is what
this hand is easily worth.
(b) 4♠
Partner is inviting game and you should go with 7-8 points.
Hand G: (a) Dbl.
“automatic” if you play negative doubles to this level. If you do not play
negative doubles to this level than a (take-out) double is very clear.
(b) Dbl. As I said above, it’s very clear and so
not influenced by partner’s pause.
Hand H (a) Dbl
or 1NT? I prefer 1NT as it has two great ♦
stops and you are fixed if you double and partner bids 2♣. Also 1NT has the advantage that you will
probably end up as declarer in an eventual ♥/♠/NoTrump contract and will likely get a favourable lead. If you double then partner is almost
certain to become declarer. However, I suspect that 99% of readers will double
and with both majors that will usually (but not always) work out fine.
(b) 2♠.
Partner has shown 0-8 points. 2♠
by you now shows a strongish hand and invites partner
to bid game if he has about 7-8 points. This hand is just about worth 2♠ and I would not argue if you chose to pass. 3♠, as suggest by a couple of players, would be a
gross overbid. If you do not understand this it’s all up on the web (® Basic Bidding ® doc No. 134).
Hand J: 1♠. It
conforms with the rule of 20 and with all of the
points in the long suits I think it’s easily worth an opener and is much too
strong for a weak 2♠. I would never pass
as I do not allow a gap between my 1♠
and 2♠ openers.
Hand K: Dbl. Negative, showing 4 ♥’s. Partner’s opening and the overcall have
improved this hand and you can always rest in ♦’s if there is no 4-4 ♥ fit.