Mon 27th N-S 1st Richard(Irl)/Margit 68% 2nd Clive/Dave 58%
E-W 1st Kees/Philip 58% 2nd Tom/Ron Z 55%
Wed 1st N-S 1st Bob P/Joe 57% 2nd Jean-Charles/Peter(Lux) 54%
E-W 1st John/Kenneth 59% 2nd Bjorn/Knud 58%
Fri 3rd N-S 1st Richard(Irl)/Margit 61% 2nd Alan/Clive 57%
E-W 1st Chuck/Terry 62% 2nd Bjarni/Philip 55%
Bidding Quiz Standard American is assumed unless
otherwise stated
Hand A Hand B With Hand A RHO opens 1♠, what do you do?
♠ J109 ♠ - With Hand B RHO opens 1♠, you pass and LHO bids 2♥. The
♦ KJ2 ♦ A763 do you do?
♣ AJ2 ♣ J9862
Hand C Hand D What do you open with Hand C?
♠ 6 ♠ AQ83 (a) What would you open with Hand D?
♥ AK87543 ♥ KJ83 (b) What would you open with Hand D playing Acol?
♣ - ♣ KQ what do you bid when partner responds 1NT?
Hand E Hand F With Hand E partner opens 1♠ and
♠ A72 ♠ J105 With Hand F partner opens 1♥ and you respond 1NT (you
♥ QJ98 ♥ 1052 did not bid 2♥ as you are playing 4-card majors). Partner then
♦ Q865 ♦ A7 bids 2♠ (a reverse), what do you bid?
♣ KQ ♣ A10862
Hand G Hand H With
Hand G partner opens 1NT and
do you do?
♠ 9 ♠ A98
♥ A3 ♥ KJ6 With Hand H partner opens 1♦ and you respond 2♣. Partner
♣ K98632 ♣ AKJ75 extra values in your system. What do you bid?
Bidding Sequences Quiz All of the following occurred this/last week.
There is no intervention in the following sequences: -
(Penalty) double with the unexpected Board 23 from Wednesday 1st
Dealer: ♠ -
Both vul ♦ A763 - - - pass
♣ J9862 1♠ pass 2♥ (1) pass
4♥ (2) pass 4NT (3) pass
♠ AJ543 N ♠ K108 5♥ (4) pass 6♥ pass
♥ K54 W E ♥ AQ762 pass dbl (5) 6♠ (6) pass (7)
♠ Q9762
♥ 3
♦ Q85
♣ Q753
Don’t take-out double with flat hands Board 3 from Wednesday 1st
N-S went for 800 on this deal, who would you blame or was it just unlucky?
Dealer: ♠ J109
E-W vul ♦ KJ2 - - - pass
♣ AJ2 1♠ dbl (1) redbl (2) pass
pass 1NT (3) dbl all
pass
♠ KQ543 N ♠ A72
♥ K5 W E ♥ QJ98
♠ 86
♥ 1032
♦ 10973
♣ 9854
(1) What did you bid with this North hand A in this week’s quiz? Now I can be quoted as saying that a double of 1♠ usually promises 4 ♥’s, but that does not mean that you should make a take-out double just because you hold 4 ♥’s. A take-out double needs to be shapely, with shortage in the suit bid and playable in the other 3 suits. This totally flat hand does not qualify for a take-out double in my opinion and I would pass.
(2) What did you bid with this East hand E in this week’s quiz? A redouble shows 9+ points and is usually looking for a penalty, and (even at this vulnerability) it must be the best bid.
(3) And here we see just one problem with doubling with a flat hand, N-S have no fit and nowhere to go except down (a long way).
A reverse guarantees 4-5 or better shape Board 15 from Wednesday 1st
E-W ended up in a silly 4♥ on this deal, who would you blame?
Dealer: ♠ 742
N-S vul ♦ 8642 - - - pass
♣ 742 1♥ (1) pass 1NT (2) pass
2♠ (3) pass 4♥ (4) all
pass
♠ AQ83 N ♠ J105
♥ KJ83 W E ♥ 1052
♠ K96
♥ Q96
♦ J1053
♣ 943
A bit pathetic? Board 21 from Friday 3rd
Dealer: ♠ J1076542
N-S vul ♦ Q53 - pass 1NT 2♥
♣ 107 2NT (1) 3♠ pass pass
pass (2) pass pass
♠ 9 N ♠ Q85
♥ A3 W E ♥ K542
♠ AK
♥ QJ10987
♦ K984
♣ 4
(1) What did you bid with this West hand G in this week’s quiz? This 2NT bid was (usually) a weak bid in their system. With a ♥ stop 3NT is obviously best here, the ♣ suit will probably be very useful in 3NT.
(2) And West had another chance to bid 3NT but failed to do so. Pathetic.
Like a bull in a china shop? Board 15 from Friday 3rd
Dealer: ♠ 10432
N-S vul ♦ 987 - - - pass
♣ 1093 1♦ pass 2♣ (1) pass
2♥ (2) pass 6NT (3) all pass
♠ J N ♠ A98
♥ AQ42 W E ♥ KJ6
♠ KQ765
♥ 1075
♦ KQ3
♣ 82
(1) E-W play 2/1 and have agreed that this sequence is also game forcing.
(2) And they have also agreed that a reverse after a (game forcing) two level response simply bids out the shape and in no way shows extra values. Note that this is not standard and you would have to agree with your partner if you play a reverse after a two level response as not promising extras. I do not think that a 3♠ splinter bid is good here with only 3 ♣’s (partner may have only a 4 card ♣ suit). It’s best to simply bid out your shape.
(3) What did you bid with this East hand H in this week’s quiz? This flamboyant 6NT ‘bull in a china shop’ bid has no merit whatsoever. I would bid 2♠ (4th suit) and if partner responds 2NT then a quantitative 4NT is surely correct. In this actual deal West would have bid 3♣ over a 4th suit 2♠ and then East could happily investigate and bid the excellent ♣ slam once he learns about the two key cards + ♣Q from partner (using RKCB).
- Don’t charge off like a bull into a no hope NT slam if there is a much better slam in a minor.
- You can always use 4th suit forcing to find out more about partner’s hand.
- A reverse after a two level response traditionally shows extra values. More enlightened players these days play that it does not.
- Of course if you play Acol (so a two level response may be just 8+) then a reverse must show the traditional 16+.
- Bidding minor suit slams is always a tricky business, but you don’t find them by charging off into 6NT!
A 2♣ opener? Board 16 from Friday 3rd
Dealer: ♠ J3 Table A
E-W vul ♦ 1043 pass pass 2♣ (1) 4♠ (2)
♣ J9754 pass pass 6♥ (3) pass (4)
all
pass
♠ 10975 N ♠ 6
♥ Q9 W E ♥ AK87543 Table B
♠ AKQ842 pass pass 5♦ (5) pass (6)
♥ 6 6♦ (7) all pass
♦ 8
♣ AKQ102
Table A: (1) What did you open with this East hand C in this week’s quiz? As I’ve said a few times in the past, I personally don’t like to open 2♣ with two-suiters. The problem being that you are quite likely to get intervention at a high level and then you do not have room to show both suits. I would open 1♥ playing Standard American (there is zero chance of it being passed out when you have just 14 points and only one black card) and then bid ♦’s at a high level. But I realise that a large number of players prefer 2♣, so I guess it’s just a matter of style.
(2) Here South also has a bid hand and there is an argument for simply bidding 2♠ and thus hopefully have room to bid ♣’s later.
(3) East was later apparently very proud of his bidding. I doubt if he would have been so happy if partner had these 4 ♦’s and a ♥ void or small singleton.
(4) South does not have room to bid his ♣’s now.
Hand A: Pass. A take-out double is a poor choice as it should be short in the suit bid and playable in the other 3 suits.
Hand B: Double. You have two sure tricks but I have stated in earlier news-sheets that it is unwise to double if the opponents have somewhere to run (6♠). But in this situation it’s safe to double as you have a ♠ void and therefore partner must have a ♠ stack. I would not double with a similar hand with a couple of ♠’s (say ♠62 ♥J1098 ♦A763 ♣J98).
Hand C: 1♥. Now I know that there are many people out there who will tell you to open 2♣, but I (and many experts) do not like to open 2♣ with two-suiters as you will not have room to mention both of your suits when they jump in at a high level which is what you should expect when you have a void and a singleton. Also, 14 points is way off the mark for a 2♣ opening in my style – partner will expect more and if you mis-lead partner in this way you are playing single-handed bridge (only your 13 cards count and partner is irrelevant – so why not simply open 6♥?)
Hand D: (a) 2NT.
(b) 2NT.
(c) 3NT. A 2♠ reverse is incorrect as that promises 5+ ♥’s even in Acol.
Hand E: Redouble, out for blood.
Hand F: 4♥. Partner has now promised 5 ♥’s. 3♥ is incorrect as it’s passable and you are maximum.
Hand G: 3NT, no other sensible option.
Hand H: 2♠. 4th suit forcing. If partner does not have a ♠ stop then you do not want to be in 6NT. If partner shows a ♠ stop by bidding NT then you can invite with 4NT and it’s played by the correct hand. If partner denies a ♠ stop and bids 3♣ then that’s great as 6♣ (or even 7♣) must be there.
Bidding Sequence Answers
K 1♥ - 1NT - 2♠ - 3♥ 2♠ is a reverse promising 5 ♥’s. Is 3♥ weak or forcing? Weak.