Mon 22nd 1st Bob P & Bob S 58% 2nd Derek & Gerard 57%
Wed 24th 1st Jan & Kenneth 58% 2nd Hans B & Henrik 55%
Fri 26th 1st Jim & Phil 72% 2nd Hans K & Fred 53%
Bidding Quiz Standard American is assumed unless
otherwise stated.
♠ AQ ♠ 1082
♥ Q1062 ♥ K432 With Hand B partner opens 1♠. (a) what do you bid?
♠ AQJ95 ♠ 2
♥ Q ♥ KQJ10983 With Hand D it’s love all and
♠ J104 ♠ K97543
♥ K72 ♥ - With Hand
F partner opens 1♣ and
♦ Q943 ♦ QJ10972 you do?
Try for game or bid it? Board 1 from Wednesday 24th
Dealer: ♠ 64 Table A
Love all ♦ 93 - pass pass pass
♣ AQ872 1♠ pass pass (1) dbl (2)
2♦ pass pass (3) pass
♠ AQJ95 N ♠ 1082
♥ Q W E ♥ K432 Table B
♠ K73 1♠ pass 2♠ (1) pass
♥ A985 3♠ (4) pass pass (5) pass
♦ 105
♣ KJ103 Table C
West(C) North East(B) South
- pass pass pass
1♠ pass 2♠ (1) pass
4♠ (6) all pass
Is it forcing? Board 5 from Friday 26th
Dealer: ♠ KQ876 Table A
N-S vul ♦ A107 - 1♠ pass 2NT (1)
♣ 8 pass 3♥ (2) pass 3♠ (3)
pass 4♠ (4) all pass
♠ 32 N ♠ A95
♥ 10954 W E ♥ 83 Table B
♠ J104 pass 4♣ (5) pass 4♥
♥ K72 pass 6NT pass pass
♦ Q943
♣ AKQ
And what happened? 4♠ made +2, everybody else bid slam.
When the 2NT bid should have been used Board 27 from Friday 26th
Dealer: ♠ KJ72 Table A
Love all ♦ K6 - - - pass
♣ J7 1♦ 1♥ 2♣ (1) pass
3♣ pass pass (2) pass
♠ 865 N ♠ AQ
♥ 7 W E ♥ Q1062 ‘Expert Table’
♠ 10943 1♦ 1♥ 2NT (1) pass
♥ 984 3NT (3) all pass
♦ 1072
♣ 952
‘Expert’ (1) This expert chose 2NT rather than 3NT.
Table: (2) And with this good shape West should bid the game.
And what happened? Nobody bid game, but the two pairs in 2NT scored a joint top when they both made +2.
Does a negative double show both suits? Board 1 from Friday 26th
Dealer: ♠ AQJ Table A
Love all ♦ K5 - 1♣ 3♥ (1) dbl (2)
♣ KJ93 pass 3NT pass pass (3)
pass
♠ 1086 N ♠ 2
♥ 75 W E ♥ KQJ10983 Table B
♠ K97543 pass 4♠ (4) all pass
♥ -
♦ QJ10972
♣ 4
And what happened? 3NT went 4 down. The rest bid 4♠ making +2.
Bidding Quiz Answers
Hand A: 2NT or 3NT. With just 4 ♥’s I would no go for the penalty and I
personally would bid 3NT but would not argue with the more conservative
invitational 2NT.
Hand B: (a) 2♠. Very clear.
(b) Pass. Partner has made a general game try and
with 3 small trumps this hand is not worth game.
(c) 4♠.
If partner makes a help-suit game (HSGT) try in ♦’s then this hand is worth a shot at game because of the great double
fit.
(d) 4♥.
Partner’s 3♥ bid is a HSGT in ♥’s and he may or may not have 4 ♥’s. So bid 4♥ in case there is a 4-4 fit there and partner will convert to 4♠ when necessary.
Hand C: Either 4♠ or 3♦ (HSGT). If you choose to invite then a HSGT of
3♦ is clearly better than a 3♠ bid. I personally would (did) bid 4♠ as I like the 5-5 shape.
Hand D: 4♥.
It’s too good for 3♥ and I don’t really
see the point in overcalling just 2♥.
Hand E: You have game (maybe slam) and cannot make
a non-forcing bid below game, so 2♠,
3♠ 1NT and 2NT are out. 2♦ is very reasonable and the sensible
alternative is 3NT (13-15 balanced).
Hand F: 3♠.
With this shape I think it’s good enough for a forcing
3♠. The problem with a negative double (even if
you do play it as showing the two unbid suits) is that partner will not believe
that you have 6 ♠’s. So bid 3♠ now and bid the ♦’s later if
necessary.