to news-sheet main page |
|||||
to Pattaya Bridge home page |
|||||
to bridge book reviews | to bridge conventions | to No Trump bidding | |||
to bridge CD's and computer games and software |
Mon 17th 1st Janne & Lars 66% 2nd Guttorm &
Wed 19th N-S 1st Alan & Jean 61% 2nd
Lewis
&
E-W 1st Terry & Guttorm 62% 2nd Lars & BamBam 59%
Fri 21st N-S 1st Terry & Bob P 59% 2nd Lars G & Lars B 57%
E-W 1st Derek & Gerard 64% 2nd = Guttorm &
= Knut & Rejar 55%
Bidding Quiz Standard
American bidding is assumed unless otherwise stated.
♠ AQJ10432 ♠ AQ87643
♥
65 ♥
83 What do you open with Hand A?
♦ 863 ♦ J3
♠
A943 ♠ 6
♥ A952 ♥ QJ43 With Hand D partner opens 1♠, what do you bid?
♦ 864 ♦ AK96
Bidding Sequence Quiz
E 1♣ pass 1♦ 1♠
F 1♣ pass 1♦ 1♠
pass pass
The 2NT Response Board 6
(North) from Wednesday 19th
♠
6 What did you bid with
this hand D in this week’s quiz.
♥ QJ43 Assuming you
do not play Jacoby 2NT or similar then 2NT is11-12
♦ AK96 points and that is what one
North bid. However, the bid is incorrect
A Psyche? Board
3 from Wednesday 19th
I was not
impressed with North’s (a grandmaster) bidding on this board.
Dealer: ♠
A943 West North(C) East South
South ♥ A952 - - - 1♣
E-W vul ♦ 864 pass 1♦ (1) 1♠ pass
♣
76 pass
all pass
♠ 105 N ♠ K8762
♥ J10 W E ♥ Q83 (1) What did you bid with this North hand C
♣
A10842 ♣ J of
course and not approved of in this club.
♠ QJ (2) Attempting to recover from the bad turn of
♥
K764 events.
♦ Q9 (3) Seems very reasonable to me
♣ KQ953
So what’s this all about? North’s reasoning was
apparently that if partner has a 4-card major then she will bid it and a
psychic 1♦ bid could do no harm and a major suit fit will not be lost.
Unfortunately East threw a spanner in the works and N-S’s ♥ fit was
lost. North said that his double at (2) promised ♥’s – I (and South)
disagree, it simply shows values.
And what happened? 2♣ went -1 for a poor score. Everybody else found
their ♥ fit of course. The bottom lines: -
-
Bidding
like this North’s 1♦ bid is not
appreciated at this club, with a number of beginners around who think that they
might learn from grandmasters.
-
There is absolutely no logical
reason for bidding 1♦ other than hopefully preventing a ♦ lead against the
final contract (i.e. a psyche). The drawbacks of this silly bid are that you
may end up in a ♦ contract or a major suit fit may get lost (as actually happened)
and also that your shenanigans will be reported to the director.
-
Psyches are not allowed at this
club.
-
Why is it that good players
have to resort to these silly tactics of stupid bids? Only a little while ago a
good player was thrown out because of his subsequent rude and arrogant attitude
having made a similar silly bid upon which I obviously commented.
-
Is it just
that good players simply have to show ‘how clever they are’ by making
ridiculous bids when straightforward good accurate bidding and good play will
presumably get them good scores?
-
I believe
that the answer to the above is no – we have had numerous internationals and
grandmasters at our club, only two proved to be a problem. Most good players
realize that they do not need to resort to silly bids when playing at club
level.
Dave’s Column Here is Dave’s
input involving the opening bid.
South What
do you open with this Hand A, first seat, vulnerable against not?
♠ AQJ10432
♥
65
♦ 863
♣ 8
Dave’s Column
answer Board
11 from Wednesday 19th
Dealer: ♠ K7 West North East South(A)
South ♥ AK32 - - - 3♠
Love all ♦ A9752 pass 4♠ all pass
♣ 64
What did you open
with this South hand A in this
♠
6 N ♠
985 week’s quiz? You should open with 3♠, the hand
♥ Q109 W E ♥ J874 has
a fine seven-card suit and a little distribution.
♣
AJ1072 ♣ KQ953 vulnerable,
but there are good reasons why bidding three is better than bidding two.
♠ AQJ10432 The main reason is that 2♠ promises a 6-card suit
♥
65
and South has 7 ♠’s. The second reason is that a
♦ 863 3♠
bid puts more pressure on the opposition.
♣ 8
The Club Championships
|
Gold Cup = Best 30 |
Silver Plate = Best 10 |
Bronze Medal = Best 5 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1875.8 Hans Vikman 1843.8 Dave Cutler 1841.8 1836.8 Lewis Berg 1825.1 Janne Roos 1802.2 Bob Pelletier 1801.8 Lars Gustafsson 1782.5 Ivy Schlageter 1727.5 Jan v Koss |
672.7 Hans Vikman 663.6 661.8 Dave Cutler 661.1 Jeremy Watson 653.4 Lewis Berg 650.9 Lars Gustafsson 642.9 Janne Roos 642.7 Ivy Schlageter 637.7 636.1 Bob Pelletier |
347.2 Hans Vikman 342.3 Dave Cutler 341.1 Jeremy Watson 341.1 339.7 Lars Gustafsson 335.8 Lewis Berg 335.3 Ivy Schlageter 329.9 Derek & Gerard 327.4 326.2 Bob Pelletier |
West East You are West, declarer
in 7♠ and North leads the ♣K.
♣
8 ♣ A64
Dave’s 2nd
Column answer Board 26 from Wednesday 12th
Dealer: ♠ - West North East South
West ♥ 86532 1♠ pass 2NT (1) pass
N-S vul ♦ J987 3♣ (2) pass 3♦ (3) pass
♣ KQJ9 3♥ (3) pass 4NT (4) pass
5♣ (5) pass 5♦ (6) pass
♣
8 ♣ A64 (2) ♣
shortage
♠ 10987 (3) cue bid
♥
107 (4) RKCB
♦ 104 (5) 3 (or 0)
keycards
♣ 107532 (6) do you have the trump queen?
(7) yes,
but no outside king (5♠ denies the ♠Q).
North leads the ♣Q, plan the play.
It’s a lay down if trumps are 2-2 or 3-1, so
you must consider a 4-0 break. You win with the ♣A and should play a trump to the ♠A.
When North discards you could hope for a 3-3 ♦ break or for South to have at least 4 ♦’s, but there is a much better play.
Cross to table with the ♦K and ruff a ♣ in hand. Return to dummy with a ♥
and ruff another ♣. Cash the two remaining ♠ honours in hand, return to dummy with a ♥, and remove South’s last ♠ with dummy’s ♠J, discarding your ♦ loser. Your 13 t
-
Sometimes you can generate an extra t
Bidding
Quiz Answers
Hand A: 3♠.
It’s a good 7-card suit with reasonable distribution.
Hand C: 1♥,
obviously. 1♦, apart from being a silly bid, is a psyche.
Bidding Sequence Answers
E 1♣ pass 1♦ 1♠ This
is up to partnership agreement. Traditionally it shows
F 1♣ pass 1♦ 1♠ This
is an ‘Action Double’. It shows the balance of power
pass pass