to news-sheet main page |
|||||
to Pattaya Bridge home page |
|||||
to bridge book reviews | to bridge conventions | to No Trump bidding | |||
to bridge CD's and computer games and software |
Mon 1st N-S
1st Jeremy &
E-W 1st Asmund & Knut N 64% 2nd Derek & Gerard 56%
Wed 3rd N-S 1st Hans & Lars B 67% 2nd Arne & Svein 57%
E-W 1st Ivy & Terry 62% 2nd Agne & Britta 60%
Fri 5th 1st Lars B & Jean 60% 2nd Lars G & Lennart 57%
Bidding Quiz Standard
American bidding is assumed unless otherwise stated.
♠
KJ87 ♠
A1042
♥ KQ2 ♥ J With
Hand B it’s favourable vulnerability. LHO opens 1♣ and
♦ AKQ1096 ♦ J10976
♠ - ♠ -
♥
9 ♥
9 What do you open
with Hand D?
♦ AKQ86 ♦ AKQJ10
Hand E Hand F With Hand E RHO opens 1♣, what do you bid?
♠ K754 ♠
J9
♥ AKQ4 ♥ AK3 With Hand F you open 1♣
and partner responds 1♠,
♣
J92 ♣ AK10652
Bidding Sequence Quiz
G 1♥ pass 3♥ pass You are playing RKCB
4NT pass 5NT/6♦/6♥ What is a 5NT, 6♦ or 6♥ response?
H 1♥ pass 3♥ pass You are playing RKCB
5♣ What
is the 5♣ bid?
J 1♣ pass 1♠ pass
2NT How many ♣’s does opener promise? 2,3,4 or more?
K 1♣ pass 1♠ pass
3NT What
sort of hand does 3NT show?
L 4NT What does a 4NT opening bid mean?
Play of the suit Board 3 from Monday 1st
I was asked how to play the ♠ suit on this deal, and what the odds are of dropping a singleton or
doubleton honour if you play the ♠A first. Now I do not pretend to be an expert on play, but I said that I
would play the ♠9 from dummy and
run it if not covered. If this loses, I re-enter dummy and finesse again.
Dealer: ♠
KQ2 West North East South
South ♥ Q92 - - - pass
E-W vul ♦ QJ87 pass pass 1♠ pass
♣ 1064 2♠ pass 3♥ (1) pass
4♠ (2) all
pass
♠ 9873 N ♠ AJ1065
♥ A10 W E ♥ J863 (1) A help suit game try, which can also be
♣
9875 ♣ AKQ (2) With ♥A10 and 4 trumps, accepting is fine.
♠ 4
♥
K754 South apparently led the ♦A and switched to a ♣, declarer
♦ A9632 was reluctant to use up his ♥A entry and so played the ♠A.
♣ J32 Is this a reasonable play of
the suit?
.
I put
the cards into the Suit Play Calculator on the website, and it ran the ♠9. If this lost it
then re-entered dummy and finessed again. I put the missing cards into the Suit
Split Calculator on the website and it came up with the table below. The problem
with this recommended line is that there is only one quick entry to dummy, but
there is a second with a ♥ ruff and a ♥ can be pitched from
hand on the ♦K before taking the 2nd ♠ finesse.
No |
W |
E |
Probability |
|
Total |
1 |
- |
kqxx |
4.783 |
1 |
4.783 |
2 |
x |
kqx |
6.217 |
2 |
12.435 |
3 |
xx |
kq |
6.783 |
1 |
6.783 |
4 |
q |
kxx |
6.217 |
1 |
6.217 |
5 |
qx |
kx |
6.783 |
2 |
13.565 |
6 |
qxx |
k |
6.217 |
1 |
6.217 |
7 |
k |
qxx |
6.217 |
1 |
6.217 |
8 |
kx |
qx |
6.783 |
2 |
13.565 |
9 |
kxx |
q |
6.217 |
1 |
6.217 |
10 |
kq |
xx |
6.783 |
1 |
6.783 |
11 |
kqx |
x |
6.217 |
2 |
12.435 |
12 |
kqxx |
- |
4.783 |
1 |
4.783 |
And what happened? Three pairs were in 4♠, this declarer went -1 and the other two made
the contract. The other three pairs were in 3♠ with just one making 10 t
(RKC) Blackwood with a void Board 28
from Monday 1st
One pair ended up in an
undignified final contract of 6NT on these unsuitable (for NT) hands. I won’t
give full auctions; but concentrate on the situation when ♠’s have been agreed, both North
and South are in a game-forcing auction, that North has shown very good ♦’s and 4 ♠’s and that South has shown ♠’s and values in ♥’s and that the last bid was 3♠ before the other player uses RKCB.
I am not necessarily suggesting that these are the best bidding sequences, but am
using the deal to demonstrate what to do with a useful void in a Blackwood
situation. I have interchanged the ♠J and ♠Q and the ♥Q and ♥10 from the actual deal for
convenience/clarity.
Dealer: ♠
KJ87 Option
A: - South asks
West ♥ KQ2 West North(A) East South
N-S vul ♦ AKQ1096 … 3♠ pass 4NT
♣ - pass 5NT (1) pass 7♠ (2)
all pass
♠ 643 N ♠ 109
♥ 65 W E ♥ 109743 Option B: - South asks
♣
10974 ♣ AKQ87 … … … 3♠
♠ AQ52 pass 5♣ (3) pass 5NT (4)
♥
AJ8 pass 7♠ all
pass
♦ 73
♣ J653
Option B: (3) There are options here, but normal RKCB is a
terrible bid with a void. If you want to find out about keycards, then a jump
to five of a suit (when 4NT would be RKCB) is Exclusion RKCB – showing a void
in the suit bid and asking for keycards outside of that suit.
(4) 2
keycards plus the ♠Q – the same steps as normal RKCB but obviously
one bid higher here as 5♣ was used to ask instead of 4NT.
And what happened? Two pairs bid the excellent
7♠, there were various other contracts such as 6♠, 5♠,
4♠ and 6NT-4.
The bottom lines: -
-
It’s up to
your partnership if you want to show useful voids after RKCB, but if you do –
then do NOT do so by indicating an extra ace.
-
The RKCB
responses to show a void are on the website:
conventions
> section 1 > RKCB.
- Exclusion RKCB is also
briefly described on the website on the conventions main page.
Balancing Board
12 from Wednesday 3rd
When the opponents have found a
fit and stop bidding at the two level, then it’s
usually right to make a noise in the pass-out seat.
Dealer: ♠
J9 Table
A
West ♥ Q9853 West North East(B) South
N-S vul ♦ KQ42 pass pass pass 1♣
♣ 54 pass 1♥ pass 2♥
pass pass pass (1)
♠ Q653 N ♠ A1042
♥ K62 W E ♥ J Table B
♣
AQ63 ♣ J72 pass pass pass 1♣
♠ K87 pass 1♥ pass 2♥
♥
A1074 pass pass
♦ A2 2♠ 3♥ (2) 3♠ (3) all pass
♣ K1098
Option B: (1) This East (and I believe two others) found
this double, the answer to question B – it’s usually best not to let the
opponents play in a known fit at the two level, especially if you are non-vulnerable.
(2)
This is totally correct – North has one more trump
than already shown and with a presumed 9-card fit should compete to the 9 t
(3)
East knows that it’s probably only an 8-card ♠ fit, but with a ♥ singleton it should
play well and being non-vulnerable it’s quite acceptable to go one above the
level of The Law.
And what happened? The cards lay well for E-W
and 3♠ made exactly for the E-W top. The two other
East’s who competed with a double failed to bid on over the opponents’ 3♥ and all of the N-S’s who bid 2♥ or 3♥
made 9 t
-
If the
opponents have found a fit and stop bidding at the two-level, then it’s usually
best to compete.
- Obey The
Law in competitive auctions. And if you feel that the opponents are going to
make their contract, then you can usually safely bid one more than The Law
dictates if you are non-vulnerable.
Dave’s Column Here is Dave’s
input involving the bidding.
North South You are
South, declarer in 6♠.
♠ AQ8 ♠ KJ964 Would you prefer to be in 6♥?
♥ KQ1053 ♥
A74 West leads the ♣4 which
East wins with the ♣A and
♦ Q9 ♦ AKJ5 returns
a ♣. You ruff and play a ♠ to dummy’s ♠A,
♣ 1062 ♣ Q but
East discards a ♣. How do you continue?
Now would you prefer to be in 6♥?
Dave’s Column
answer Board
23 from Wednesday 4th
Dealer: ♠ AQ8 West North East South
South ♥ KQ1053 - - - 1♠
Both vul ♦ Q9 pass 2♥ (1) pass 3♥
♣ 1062 pass 4♠ (2) pass 4NT (3)
pass 5♦ (4) pass 5♥ (5)
♠
107532 N ♠
- pass 6♥ (6) pass 6♠
♥ J92 W E ♥ 86
all pass
♣
K84 ♣ AJ9753 (1) Game forcing, playing 2/1
♠ KJ964 (2) Setting
♠’s as trumps and showing a minimum
♥ A74 (fast arrival).
♦ AKJ5 (3) RKCB with ♠’s
as trumps
♣ Q (4) One keycard
(5) Do you have the ♠Q?
(6) Yes, and the ♥K (but not a cheaper king)
The expert South worked out that he could make
the contract if West had started out with exactly 5323 distribution.
He cashed three ♥ t
In theory, 6♥ is worse than 6♠,
and here a lot worse if East is clairvoyant and desperate to get his name in
the news-sheet. Then he would have led the ♣9 (a Lavinthal signal), which West would win with the ♣K and shift to a ♠ for the lethal ruff.
Terry’s Comment. Unfortunately the author does not say why 6♠ is in theory better. I would have thought that
6♥ is better as you can then take the ♣ ruff in the short trump hand.
Dealer: ♠ A96 West North East South
East ♥ J63 - - 2♥ (1) pass
E-W vul ♦ Q10653 3♦ pass 3♥ pass
♣ 52 4♥ pass 4NT pass
5♦ pass 6♥ all
pass
♣
43 plays
low, which ♥ do you play?
Dave’s 2nd
Column answer Board 22 from Wednesday 3rd
Dealer: ♠ A96 West North East South
East ♥ J63 - - 2♦ (1) pass
E-W vul ♦ Q10653 3♦ pass 3♥ pass
♣ 52 4♦ pass 5♣ pass
5♦
♣
43 ♣ AKQ10 lead?
♠ 7543
♥
85
This
was the bidding at out table. Because of the
♦ J9 double
South led a ♦
and 12 t
♣ J9876
Let’s suppose that North
does not double a ♦ bid, then there are four suits for South to
choose from for the opening lead. And none is totally obvious.
With a ♣
lead, declarer gets a free finesse and makes the contract comfortably. After
drawing trumps he leads a low ♠ to the ♠J and if the opposition do
not take their ♠A he actually makes 13 t
A ♦
lead also makes things easy, allowing South to discard
the ♣10 and claim 12 t
With a ♠
lead declarer plays the ♠J from dummy and is
ensured of a ♠ entry to the ♦’s for the discard of the ♣10.
The best lead for the defence
is a trump, but North must be alert and forget about ‘third hand plays high’. If
he goes up with the ♥J then declarer has
the ♥10 as an entry to the ♦A for a ♣
discard. North must play a low ♥
to the first t
A Huge two-suited
hand Board 3
from Friday 3rd
Dealer: ♠
A9862 Table
A
South ♥ 72 West(E) North East South(C)
E-W vul ♦ 10972 - - - 1♣ (1)
♣ Q6 2♣ (2) pass 2♥ 3♦ (3)
3♥ 4♦ pass 5♦ (4)
♠ K754 N ♠ QJ103
♥ AKQ4 W E ♥ J108653
♣
J92 ♣ 10 West North East South(C)
♠ - - - - 2♣ (1)
♥
9
pass 2♦ pass 3♣
♦ AKQ86 pass 3♠ pass 4♦
♣ AK87543 pass 5♦ pass 6♦
all pass
Table C
West North East South(C)
- - - 4NT (1)
pass 5♦ (5) pass 6♦ (6)
all pass
Table B: (1) This South decided to open 2♣, Ok if that’s your
style.
Table C: (1) Now this is an interesting opening! What does
it (sequence L) mean? “Standard” is that it asks for the suit of partner’s ace
(if he has one). It’s quite a sensible bid although I would like the minor suits
to be more solid, like Hand D which is a classic 4NT opener.
(5)
North did not know the meaning of the bid and so
answered to Blackwood.
(6)
Apparently South had a
different meaning for his 4NT bid – ‘bid your best minor’. I’ve never heard of
this meaning but it luckily got to the correct contract played by the correct
hand (no ♥A lead).
And what happened? 6♦**+1, 6♦+1,
6♦= twice, 5♦*+1
and 5♣+1.
The bottom lines: -
-
This South
hand has enormous playing strength and should make slam opposite most dummies.
If you take it slowly and find that partner has ♦ support then you should reach 6♦ easily.
The 4NT
opening
♠ - The
4NT opening uses up a lot of bidding space and needs to be very
♥ 9 specific. The normally accepted use of the bid is asking
partner to bid
♦ AKQJ10 the suit of his
ace if he has one.
Responses are 5♣ = no ace; 5♦/♥/♠/6♣ = that ace; 5NT = two aces.
A 4NT opener usually has two
aces, a void, and one or two solid suits with just one singleton outside loser.
This hand D is typical. Open
4NT; if partner responds 5♥ then bid 7♣; if partner
responds 5♣ or 5♠ then bid 6♣; if partner responds 5NT then bid 7NT.
The Club Championships
|
Gold Cup = Best 30 |
Silver Plate = Best 10 |
Bronze Medal = Best 5 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1887.5 Hans Vikman 1846.0 1843.9 Dave Cutler 1836.8 Lewis Berg 1825.1 Janne Roos 1812.1 Lars Gustafsson 1803.9 Bob Pelletier 1790.3 Ivy Schlageter 1727.5 Jan v Koss |
675.2 Hans Vikman 663.6 661.8 Dave Cutler 661.1 Jeremy Watson 653.4 Lewis Berg 651.0 Lars Gustafsson 643.6 Ivy Schlageter 642.9 Janne Roos 640.6 Derek & Gerard 639.0 |
347.2 Hans Vikman 342.3 Dave Cutler 341.1 Jeremy Watson 341.1 339.7 Lars Gustafsson 335.8 Lewis Berg 335.3 Ivy Schlageter 329.9 Derek & Gerard 327.4 326.2 Bob Pelletier |
Chicken! Board 19 from Friday 3rd
There was a humorous post-mortem after the end of play at table A.
Somebody called North ‘chicken’ for bidding only 2NT at (3). North said that
South was chicken for not biding 3NT when holding the ‘important’ ♣Q. So who really
was the chicken? My opinions follow: -
Dealer: ♠
J9 Table
A
South ♥ AK3 West North(F) East South
E-W vul ♦ A6 - - - pass
♣ AK10652 pass 1♣ pass (1) 1♠ (2)
pass 2NT (3) pass pass (4)
♠ A4 N ♠ KQ108 pass
♥ 8654 W E ♥ QJ7
♣
743 ♣ J98 West North(F) East South
♠ 76532 - - - pass
♥
1092 pass 1♣ pass (1) 1♠ (2)
♦ J543 pass 3NT (3) all pass
♣ Q
Table B: (3) This North found the best bid,
3NT shows a good hand with a good long minor.
And what happened? 3NT=, 2NT+1, 3♣+1, 3♣=
twice and 2NT (by East) -3.
At Table A
somebody suggested that North should have bid 3NT at (3). North dismissed this
opinion and said that South should have raised to 3NT because he had the ♣Q. What’s more, I think that North was actually
being serious!! This is total nonsense of course; South has scraped up a
bid on 4 points and has no reason to know that partner has a good 6-card ♣ suit (indeed, the 2NT rebid denies this).
North could easily have a 3433 19 count and a raise to 3NT by South would be
preposterous. 3NT is lucky to come home of course (losing just 4 ♠ t
The bottom lines: -
- With a good hand and a good
long minor, rebid 3NT rather than 2NT.
Bidding
Quiz Answers
Hand A: 5NT. 5♥
is the normal response, but there is a way to show a useful void and the
recommended method is that 5NT shows 2 or 4 keycards and a 6-level bid shows 1
or 3 keycards (both with a useful void of course).
Hand C: 1♣
or 2♣. I note that one player opened 1♦ and then jumped in ♣’s – this is wrong as it lies about the
distribution of the minor suits. The hand has 17 HCPs and 11 playing t
Bidding Sequence Answers
G 1♥ pass 3♥ pass (a) 5NT = two keycards and a useful void.
4NT pass 5NT/6♦/6♥ (b) 6♦ = 1 or 3 keycards and a ♦ void
(c) 6♥ = 1 or 3 keycards and a void in a suit higher ranking than trumps, so in this case a ♠ void.
H 1♥ pass 3♥ pass 5♣ is Exclusion RKCB,
asking for keycards outside the ♣ suit,
5♣ opener has a good hand with a ♣ void.
J 1♣ pass 1♠ pass Opener may well have just 3 ♣’s (3433). He cannot have just
2NT two as he would then have 4 ♠’s. He may have 4+ but has not promised anything other than 3+ and 18-19 points.
K 1♣ pass 1♠ pass 3NT shows a good hand with a good long ♣ suit (or possibly
3NT a 1444 or similar hand
with 20+ or so points).
L 4NT A 4NT opening
asks partner for the suit of his ace, if he has one.