Our website is www.pattayabridge.com Club News Sheet – No. 336

Our blogsite is www.pattayabridge.wordpress.com

My home phone is 038 422924 and my mobile number is 083 6066880 19^th April 2009

It is best to use my home number to contact me unless I am at the bridge club.

My e-mail is terry@pattayabridge.com or pattayabridge@yahoo.com

My MSN messenger ID is tj_quested@hotmail.com

Mon 13^th 1^st Jeremy & Sally 63% 2^nd Hans V & Janne 55%

Wed 15^th 1^st Jean & Terry Q 61% 2^nd Janne & Per-Ake 60%

Fri 17^th 1^st Kjell & Odd 67% 2^nd Dave C & Terry Q 64%

	to news-sheet main page
	to Pattaya Bridge home page
	to bridge book reviews	to bridge conventions	to No Trump bidding
	to bridge CD's and computer games and software

Bidding Quiz Standard American bidding is assumed unless otherwise stated.

Hand A Hand B With Hand A nobody is vulnerable and RHO opens 1♦, what

do you bid?

♠ - ♠ J8

♥ J74 ♥ A2 With Hand B partner opens 1♦ (4+ ♦’s) and RHO doubles,

♦ 64 ♦ Q7642 what do you bid?

♣ KQJ109643 ♣ K1062

Bidding Sequence Quiz

C 2♥ 2NT 2♥ is weak, what is 2NT – natural or for the minors.

D 1♦ dbl 2NT (a) what is 2NT

(b) what would redouble be?

	Gold Cup = Best 30	Silver Plate = Best 10	Bronze Medal = Best 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10	Current standings 18-April-2009	643.2 Janne Roos 638.9 Hans Vikman 625.5 Paul Quodomine 617.4 Sally Watson 612.8 Lars Broman 609.9 Bob Short 607.6 Per Andersson 601.1 Jean Wissing 588.6 Derek & Gerard 586.4 Johan Bratsberg	331.8 Janne Roos 329.0 Hans Vikman 321.7 Bob Short 321.0 Per Andersson 320.9 Paul Quodomine 320.7 Sally Watson 316.1 Lars Broman 313.5 Jeremy Watson 312.8 Dave Hurst 312.9 Jean Wissing

4-level pre-empt enough? Board 27 from Friday 27^th

When deciding how high to pre-empt, one guide is Culbertson’s rule of 2,3,4. At equal vulnerability it’s the rule of three which suggests that you should bid to the level where you expect to go three down. So with this West hand (which has 7 tricks) you should compete at the 4-level and so overcall with a pre-emptive 4♣. However, many people (including me) do not agree with, or bid according to, Culbertson’s classic rules. It is silly to assume that partner has nothing, and (as in this case) it looks quite likely that the opponents may have slam and so bidding higher than Culbertson’s rule suggests is very often the best policy. Also, a hand that has absolutely no defence (as this West hand) should consider pre-empting at a higher level.

Dealer: ♠ QJ9543 Table A

South ♥ A963 West(A) North East South

Love all ♦ 102 - - - 1♦

♣ 2 4♣ (1) 4♠ (2) dbl (3) all pass

♠ - N ♠ K862 Table B

♥ J74 W E ♥ K10 West(A) North East South

♦ 64 S ♦ QJ73 - - - 1♦

♣ KQJ109643 ♣ A85 5♣ (1) 5♠ (4) dbl (5) all pass

♠ A107

♥ Q862

♦ AK985

♣ 7

Table A: (1) What did you bid with this West hand A in this week’s quiz? Culbertson’s rule of three indicates that 4♣ is the bid, and that’s what this West bid.

(2) Pre-empts always make life difficult and North really has little option but to bid 4♠ unless you play negative doubles to this level, but with a 6-card suit 4♠ is still probably best.

(3) With a defence-orientated hand, East reasonably doubles.

Table B: (1) As I said in the banter at the top of the page, Culbertson’s rules are old hat. I do not consider 4♣ as high enough and I bid 5♣.

(4) North has the same problem but one level higher. It’s all a gamble at this stage (that’s what pre-empting is all about) and North decided to bid 5♠.

(5) With a defence-orientated hand, East obviously doubles at this level.

And what happened? 4♠*=, 5♠*-2 and 5♣*-1.

The bottom lines: -

- Culbertson’s rules are too pessimistic and are rarely applied these days; the modern trend is that you should bid up and pre-empt as high as is reasonable, especially with no defence.

- It seems reasonable to me to assume that partner can contribute one trick and then apply Culbertson’s rules. But I just look at the vulnerability and use common sense.

Jordan 2NT Board 30 from Friday 27^th

Dealer: ♠ 5432 West(B) North East South

East ♥ 1065 - - 1♦ (1) dbl

Love all ♦ J985 2NT (2) pass 3NT (3) all pass

♣ Q8

(1) playing a short ♣, so promising 4+ ♦’s

♠ J8 N ♠ Q106 (2) What did you bid with this West hand B in

♥ A2 W E ♥ KQ94 this week’s quiz? Redouble would show

♦ Q7642 S ♦ AK103 9+ points but really should be more

♣ K1062 ♣ 73 penalty orientated. With just a doubleton

♠ AK97 in both majors and length in partner’s suit

♥ J873 I prefer a Jordan 2NT, showing +-11 or more

♦ - points and a sound raise to 3♦ or better

♣ AJ954 (3) Partner’s failure to double implies not much in the majors and therefore something decent in ♣’s and 3NT is clear here.

And what happened? 3NT=twice; at the third table it was 3♦*+1, presumably when North made a ridiculous pass of a second double by South.

The bottom lines: -

- If RHO doubles partner’s 1-level opening, then 2NT shows a sound raise to 3 (or more) of partner’s suit. This is the Jordon 2NT which is detailed on the website.

- More experienced players may wish to look up “Inverted Jordan for the Minors” which is written up on the website > conventions > section 2. This would enable East to be declarer in 3NT (preferable with this ♠ holding).

Dave’s Column Here is Dave’s first input about the play of the hand.

North South You are South, declarer in 6♥. West leads the ♦K which

♠ KQ2 ♠ A4 you win with the ♦A and play the ♥A upon which East

♥ J1064 ♥ AK985 discards a ♦. Can you see any hope of making this contract?

♦ 93 ♦ AJ5

♣ AQ102 ♣ K43

Dave’s Column answer Board 17 from Wednesday 15^th

Dealer: ♠ KQ2 West North East South

North ♥ J1064 pass 1♣ pass 1♥

Love all ♦ 93 pass 2♥ pass 4NT

♣ AQ102 pass 5♦ (1) pass 5♠ (2)

pass 6♥ (3) all pass

♠ J93 N ♠ 108765

♥ Q732 W E ♥ - (1) 1 keycard (03,14)

♦ KQ S ♦ 1087642 (2) do you have the trump queen?

♣ J975 ♣ 86 (3) no (a return to the trump suit denies the

♠ A4 queen)

♥ AK985

♦ AJ5

♣ K43

West leads the ♦K which you win but East shows out when you lead the ♥A, plan the play.

There is a small hope. You have to get rid of two ♦’s with West following suit to all of your winners. For that to succeed, West needs to have at least 3 ♠’s and, crucially, at least 4 ♣’s. So start with the ♠AKQ discarding a ♦. Then lead a ♣ to the ♣A and ♣K and finally finesse the ♣10. You have to take the finesse, a 3-3 ♣ split will do you no good. However, if the ♣ finesse works you can pitch the last ♦ on the ♣Q and then drive out the ♥Q to make the slam.

.

Dave’s 2^nd Column Here is Dave’s 2^nd input concerning the play of the hand.

Dealer: ♠ A8542

East ♥ 63 West North East South

N-S vul ♦ Q94 - - 1♥ pass

♣ 643 2♥ pass 4♥ all pass

♠ KQ106 N You are North, defending 4♥. Partner leads the ♣J which

♥ Q104 W E declarer (East) wins with the ♣Q. Declarer cashes the ♥A and

♦ 1085 S ♥J and then leads a ♠ towards dummy’s ♠K which you take

♣ 752 with the ♠A. How do you proceed?

Dave’s 2^nd Column answer Board 18 from Wednesday 15^th

Dealer: ♠ A8542

East ♥ 63 West North East South

N-S vul ♦ Q94 - - 1♥ pass

♣ 643 2♥ pass 4♥ all pass

♠ KQ106 N ♠ 7

♥ Q104 W E ♥ AKJ985

♦ 1085 S ♦ K73

♣ 752 ♣ AKQ

♠ J93

♥ 72

♦ AJ72

♣ J1098

♠ 8542 This is the position, with you (North) on lead

♥ - having just won the ♠A, what do you do?

♦ Q94

♣ 64 i.e. which ♦ do you lead?

♠ Q106 N ♠ - Appreciating the need for quick ♦ winners

♥ Q W E ♥ K985 North led the ♦4. With the ♦10 in dummy, East

♦ 1085 S ♦ K73 ducked, South won the ♦J but declarer was now

♣ 75 ♣ AK safe, with just one more ♦ to lose.

♠ J9 Would it have mattered if North had led the ♦Q?

♥ - Yes and no. It depends upon what happens next.

♦ AJ72 But the ♦Q is a much better play.

♣ 1098 If East ducks expecting North to have ♦QJ9, he is in for a surprise and a ♦ continuation sets the contract.

What if East covers the ♦Q? It’s not over yet, When South wins with the ♦A and boldly underleads his ♦J declarer still has a critical guess. If he finesses dummy’s ♦8 he goes down.

And what happened at the Pattaya Bridge Club? 5♥=, 4♥=, 3♥+1 and 2NT+1.

Basic Signals when following suit – Pattaya Standard.

A few people have been confused recently about signalling. This topic is covered in more detail on the website > General bridge Topics > Signals in defence.

When partner leads an ace or high card, most people give attitude (indicate if you like him to continue that suit or not) and the majority of players in our club play a low card to encourage.

When the opponents lead a suit to which you can follow, then you should give count (high-low for an even number). So if partner’s first card is fairly high then he is showing 2, 4, or 6 etc. A low card would normally show an odd number. This signal would be confirmed when partner follows to the suit next time; it does no apply to the trump suit..

It is important not to confuse these totally independent treatments. Suppose you are playing Pattaya standard and declarer leads an ace, a low card from you is not encouraging – it is simply giving count (an odd number) and a high card would show an even number.

♠ 542 Example

♥ 63 ¬ DUMMY

♦ Q94 You are East, defending a ♠ contract with these cards left

♣ 6 and you are playing low to encourage and standard count.

N ♠ 7 (a) Partner leads the ♦A, which card do you play?

W E ♥ J9 (b) Declarer leads the ♦A and plays low from dummy,

S ♦ J82 which card do you play?

♣ 752

Remember. It is rare that you want to encourage/discourage a suit that declarer is leading – so give count when declarer leads unless you wish to deceive declarer (and partner).

Quiz Answers

Hand A: 5♣. 4♣ is far too feeble for me.

Hand B: 2NT, showing a sound raise to 3♦ or better. 3♦ is generally played as weak and pre-emptive. Double would show 9+ points but is a poor choice with 5-card support for partner and doubletons in both majors

Bidding Sequence Quiz

C 2♥ 2NT 2NT is natural, +- 16-18 with a ♥ stop. It is not the UNT for the minors which is usually a jump in NoTrumps in a situation where it cannot be natural.

D 1♦ dbl 2NT (a) 2NT is Jordan, showing +-11 or more points in support of ♦’s

(b) redbl would show 9+ points, usually with no support for partner and looking for a penalty.

Signalling Quiz

(a) the ♦8, high to discourage.

(b) the ♦2, a low card to indicate an odd number in the suit. You cannot signal attitude when it is declarer/dummy who is leading. The ♦8 would simply show two (or 4 or 6) ♦’s.