Mon 2nd N-S 1st Janne & Paul Q 67% 2nd Bob P & Robbie 57%
E-W 1st Mike Wiss & TerryQ 66% 2nd Guttorm & Tomas 59%
Wed 4th N-S 1st = Jean & Lars B = Richard M & Tomas 56%
E-W 1st Janne & Per And… 71% 2nd = Jan & Sigurd 53%
= Hans V & Sigurd 53%
Fri 6th N-S 1st Janne & Lars B 57% 2nd Gerry & Per-Ake 56%
E-W 1st Guttorm & Paul Sc 63% 2nd Terry Q & Jean 59%
to news-sheet main page |
|||||
to Pattaya Bridge home page |
|||||
to bridge book reviews | to bridge conventions | to No Trump bidding | |||
to bridge CD's and computer games and software |
Bidding Quiz Standard
American bidding is assumed unless otherwise stated.
Hand A Hand B With Hand A partner opens 1♦ and
do you do?
♠ KQ74 ♠ KQ8532
♥ Q87 ♥ A52 With
Hand B partner opens 1NT. You transfer with 2♥ and
♣
QJ854 ♣ 6
Hand C Hand D With Hand C partner opens 1♥ and you bid 1♠. Partner rebids 1NT, what do you do?
♠
A983 ♠ J105
♥ 105 ♥ A102 (a) Do you open with Hand D in first seat?
♣
QJ ♣
76 round
to you, what do you do?
E 1♦ 2♣ pass pass
dbl What
is the double – does it show extra values?
F 1NT pass 2♥ pass
2♠ pass 4♣/4NT What
are 4♣ and 4NT?
The Tripple
Congratulations to Janne Roos for winning the triple (winning all three
sessions in the same week) two weeks in a row(!?)Wow! I note that Hans has won
it three times and Paul Q and now Janne have both won it twice and so I expect
that one or more of them will soon overtake the old codger who won it five
times many moons ago when the standard at the club was no so high.
You can help to finance the Pattaya bridge club by using the Amazon boxes below to purchase items (not necessarily bridge) | ||
Current club championship standings
|
Gold Cup = Best 30 |
Silver Plate = Best 10 |
Bronze Medal = Best 5 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1924.0 Hans Vikman 1890.8 Paul Quodomine 1804.7 Sally Watson 1732.1 Ivy Schlageter 1725.8 Bob Short 1719.9 Bob Pelletier 1709.7 Paul Scully |
682.1 659.1 636.6 625.4 Jeremy Watson 625.0 Per Andersson 624.0 Per-Ake Roskvist 621.4 Guttorm Lonborg 619.7 618.9 Bob Short |
351.7 337.1 329.8 Per Andersson 328.1 Per-Ake Roskvist 326.0 325.4 Jeremy Watson 325.3 321.7 Bob Short 319.5 Lars Broman |
The Gold Cup standings are quite likely to be unchanged at the end of the year, but anything cam happen in two busy months I guess? The bronze is the interesting competition, and presently it seems that whoever plays with Janne leaps into the lead?
Worth a raise? Board 26 from Friday
30th
This board is actually from the previous week
but there was no room in the news-sheet which I try to keep to 6- 8 pages.
Dealer: ♠
J1054 Table
A
East ♥ AJ93 West(C) North East South
both vul ♦ K108 - - 1♥ pass
♣ 102 1♠ pass 1NT pass
2NT (1) all
pass
♠
A983 N ♠
Q2
♥ 105 W E ♥ Q8762 Table B
♣
QJ ♣
AK3 - pass 1♥ pass
♠ K76 1♠ pass 1NT pass
♥
K4 pass (1) pass
♦ Q3
♣ 987654
And what happened? Everybody in 2NT went down, as Dealmaster Pro says
you should, and my partner made a clear top in 1NT with the only positive E-W
score. J
The bottom line:
- Understand hand
evaluation – it is not just a matter of adding up high card points.
Values – what values? Board 17 from Monday 2nd
I was asked to write this one up by somebody who did not think much of East’s bid.
Dealer: ♠
J West North East South
North ♥ 972 - 5♦ dbl (1) pass
Love all ♦ QJ1098652 6NT (2) all pass
♣ 6
(1) Apparently ‘values’. Now I doubt that many
♠ K8643 N ♠ Q975
have discussed exactly how many
points
♥ AKQ W E ♥ J105 you need to show ‘values’ over a 5-level
♣
AQ2 ♣ J1053 like
to have a bit more than eight points with
♠ A102 two 10’s?
♥
8643 (2) Presumably expecting a little more opposite?
♦ 7
♣ K9874
And what happened? Not surprisingly, this pair
were the only ones to bid 6NT. It made easily enough when the ♣K was onside and restricted choice (together
with the information that North had very long ♦’s) picked up four ♠ tricks to go with
the two ♦’s, three ♣’s
and three ♥’s. Maybe East realized how important the ♠97 were when he bid? So 990; 5♦* scored -4 and 800 at another table for a
second and most of the field were in 4♠
making +1 or +2.
Playing negative doubles Board 2 from Friday 2nd
Dealer: ♠
A962 West(A) North East(D) South
East ♥ K953 - - 1♦ (1) 2♣
N-S vul ♦ 6432 pass (2) pass dbl
(3) all pass
♣ 9
(1) Did you open with this East hand D(a)?
♠ KQ74 N ♠ J105
I did. It’s only 19 for the rule of
20 but has
♥ Q87 W E ♥ A102 two
tens and a great ♦ suit which is clearly
♣
QJ854 ♣ 76 (2) What did you bid with this West hand A in
♠ 83 this week’s quiz?
A negative double
♥
J64 (guaranteeing just one
4-card major here) is
♦ A109 a poor choice. Playing with a sensible
partner
♣ AK1032 you should
pass and pass his “automatic’
re-opening double.
(3) What did you bid with this
East hand D(b) in this week’s quiz? Fortunately for West, East was indeed
‘sensible’ and doubled.
And what happened? +800 and a clear top on a
part-score deal. The bottom Lines:
-
If you
think that West should bid at (2) or that East should not double at (3) then do
not play negative doubles (play penalty doubles!?) – you will let the opponents
get away with too many huge penalties if you do not appreciate the penalty pass
and ‘automatic’ re-opening double. Note that South had a decent hand (although
some would like a sixth ♣) but he still went
for 800. East’s ♦ suit and West’s ♦ lead were huge assets for the defense.
What is 4♣ and 4NT? Board 5 from Friday
6th
Dealer: ♠
6 Table
A
North ♥ K10876 West(B) North East South
N-S vul ♦ J52 - pass 1NT pass
♣ 10987 2♥ pass 2♥ pass
4NT (1) pass pass (2) pass
♠
KQ8532 N ♠
A109
♥ A52 W E ♥ Q9 Table B
♣
6 ♣
AQ52 - pass 1NT pass
♠ J74 2♥ pass 2♠ pass
♥
J43 4♣ (1) pass pass (3) all
pass
♦ A109
♣ KJ43
And what happened? Apart from the spurious 4NT contract, everybody else
was in 4♠, generally making or making +1 J
The bottom line:
-
I guess established
partnerships have to agree what 4♣ and NT mean after a transfer. With no agreement I believe
that Gerber and Quantitative are standard, and in the vote after the meeting
Linda Lyen cast the final vote confirming this by the narrowest of margins. If
you want to play splinters, then have a look at Marty Bergen style ambiguous
splinters (three of the other major) which can be played over Stayman and also
over transfers.
-
And what is my answer to
question B? I guess that an ambiguous splinter is possible, but I think it’s a
bit pushy with no super-accept and I would simply bid 4♠. The 4♠
bid is, in any case, mildly slam invitational if you play Texas Transfers or
South African Texas
♦ 832 ♦ K6 3NT pass pass pass
♣
KQ ♣ A43
South leads the ♦5 to North’s ♦Q and your ♦K. That is one benefit for 3NT. It attracted a ♦ lead allowing you to score the ♦K. With the ♦A apparently on your left, you would not have scored a ♦ trick in 4♥.
Still, you need to bring in 4 ♥ tricks in 3NT what do you play at trick two?
Suppose you choose the ♥K: ♥7,
♥2, ♥4.
How do you plan the rest of the play? Be specific.
Dealer: ♠ K93 Book bidding
East ♥ 854 West North East South
both vul ♦ Q107 - - 1♣ pass
♣
10875 1♥ pass 2NT (1) pass
3NT (2) pass pass (3) pass
♠ J7 The PARROT convention does this with a
♥
Q7
Checkback style 3♦ bid to ask for clarification
♦ AJ954 of
partner’s major suit holdings.
♣ J962
(3) The
bidding will not meet with the approval of purists, who would revert to 4♥ over 3NT. This East felt that 9 tricks in 3NT
would be at least as easy as 10 in ♥’s.
In addition, playing in no-trumps did not expose the ♦K to attack at trick one.
Anyway, whatever you think of the bidding, you
are in 3NT and South leads the ♦4.
You win and lead the ♥K: ♥7, ♥2,
♥4.
How do you plan the rest of the play?
You need 4 ♥ tricks. Having cashed the ♥K,
the normal play is to cross to dummy with a ♣ and finesse the ♥J – it fails. The
same normal play would also fail in 4♥.
Australian legend, Tim Seres, found the winning
path. As N-S would not expect East to have 4 ♥’s he led the ♥K at trick two.
Expecting partner to hold the ♥A, each defender is
bound to give honest count on the ♥K.
Seres pointed out that if both follow with the lowest card, playing natural
count, the ♥Q will be doubleton.
South played the ♥7 and North the ♥4. So the position
was not yet clear. A ♣ to dummy was
followed by the ♥10. When North played the ♥5, that could be from ♥854 or ♥Q54.
If ♥Q54 then South would have ♥87 and likely would have played the ♥8 on the first ♥. Therefore North began with ♥854
and Seres rose with the ♥8 to make his
contract.
Note that North could have made the position
tougher by playing the ♥8 on the second ♥ but defenders do not always find the best
defense. The deal appears in Play Cards with Tim Seres
which is reviewed on
page 17 of the Pattaya bridge website book store.
And what happened at the Pattaya Bridge Club? 3NT= and 3NT-2; 4♥=twice, 1♥+3, 5♥-2,
4♥-2 twice and 4♠-1.
Dave’s 2nd
Column Here
is Dave’s second problem on the play of the hand.
♣
107652 ♣ KJ4 West
leads the ♥2. South sees lots of tricks but the clock is
against him. What chance does South have of making 3NT?
Your suggestions?
Dave’s 2nd
Column answer Board
11 from Wednesday 4th
Dealer: ♠ A6 Book Bidding
South ♥ 73 West North East South
Love all ♦ KQJ10 - - - 1NT
♣
107652 pass 3NT all pass
♣ A93 ♣ Q8
♠ KQ32
♥
AK West
leads the ♥2. South sees lots of tricks but the
♦ 8765 clock is against
him. What chance does South have
♣ KJ4 of
making 3NT? Your suggestions?
And what happened at the Pattaya Bridge Club? All nine Souths who played the hand declared in 3NT: +2 twice, +1 three times, = three times and -1 once.
Bidding Quiz Answers
Hand A: pass, and hit partner over the head if he does
not have a really good excuse for not re-opening with a double.
Hand C: pass. 11 points is usually just
enough to raise to 2NT, but this is a very poor 11 points – no fit with
partner, the ♣QJ doubleton are poor and so is the 5-card ♦ suit.
E 1♦ 2♣ pass pass No,
it does NOT promise extras. It shows a hand that is
dbl prepared to
defend 2♣ doubled if that is what partner wants.
F 1NT pass 2♥ pass ‘standard’
is that 4♣ is Gerber and 4NT quantitive. Of course
2♠ pass 4♣/4NT partnerships
can have different agreements.
For the best hotel deals anywhere in Thailand, book your hotel using our free online hotel booking facility. Select the region/city and you can list the hotels in price or star rating order. You can also select hotels from a specific area of your region/city: | |||