Our website is www.pattayabridge.com Club News Sheet – No. 314

Our blogsite is www.pattayabridge.wordpress.com

My home phone is 038 422924 and my mobile number is 083 6066880 16^th Nov 2008

It is best to use my home number to contact me unless I am at the bridge club.

My e-mail is terry@pattayabridge.com or pattayabridge@yahoo.com

My MSN messenger ID is tj_quested@hotmail.com

	to news-sheet main page
	to Pattaya Bridge home page
	to bridge book reviews	to bridge conventions	to No Trump bidding
	to bridge CD's and computer games and software

Mon 10^th N-S 1^st Jeremy & Sally 58% 2^nd Lewis & Terry 55%

E-W 1^st Janne & Hans V 61% 2^nd Alan & Bam Bam 59%

Wed 12^th N-S 1^st Janne & Sally 64% 2^nd Lewis & Paul Q 63%

E-W 1^st Alan & Jean W 60% 2^nd Derek & Gerard 59%

Fri 14^th N-S 1^st Lewis & Paul Q 66% 2^nd Alain & Jean-Charles 55%

E-W 1^st Dave & Royd 60% 2^nd Hans V & Sally 55%

Bidding Quiz Standard American bidding is assumed unless otherwise stated.

Hand A Hand B With hand A partner opens 1NT, what do you bid?

♠ AJ2 ♠ A63

♥ Q987 ♥ 985 With hand B RHO opens 1♣ and you choose to overcall 1♦.

♦ K32 ♦ AQ1082 Partner bids 1NT, what do you bid?

♣ 753 ♣ A9

Hand C Hand D With Hand C partner opens 1NT what do you bid?

♠ AKJ3 ♠ Q94

♥ KJ65 ♥ 74 With Hand D LHO opens 1♣ and partner bids 1♠. RHO

♦ KJ6 ♦ Q10765 doubles (promising ♥’s), what do you bid?

♣ Q8 ♣ KQ7

Hand E Hand F (a) What do you open with Hand E?

(b) What do you open with Hand E if you play a 12-14 1NT?

♠ A42 ♠ KQ10

♥ KJ7 ♥ QJ6 With hand F you would bid 2NT if partner opened 1♦.

♦ QJ64 ♦ 653 But what happened is that LHO opened 1♣ and partner

♣ A63 ♣ QJ62 overcalled 1♦, so what do you bid in this situation? Still 2NT?

The Club Championships

Here are the latest standings in the club competitions.

	Gold Cup = Best 30	Silver Plate = Best 10	Bronze Medal = Best 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10	1875.8 Hans Vikman 1843.8 Dave Cutler 1841.8 Sally Watson 1834.0 Lewis Berg 1816.0 Janne Roos 1799.2 Bob Pelletier 1782.5 Ivy Schlageter 1727.5 Jan v Koss	672.7 Hans Vikman 663.6 Sally Watson 661.8 Dave Cutler 661.1 Jeremy Watson 653.4 Lewis Berg 646.0 Lars Gustafsson 642.7 Ivy Schlageter 639.2 Janne Roos 636.9 Tomas Wikman 636.1 Bob Pelletier	347.2 Hans Vikman 342.3 Dave Cutler 341.1 Jeremy Watson 341.1 Sally Watson 337.1 Lars Gustafsson 335.8 Lewis Berg  335.3 Ivy Schlageter 328.5 Derek & Gerard 327.4 Tomas Wikman 326.2 Bob Pelletier

Deduct a Point for the terrible 4333 type shape

♠ A42 What did you open with this Hand E in this week’s Quiz? You should deduct

♥ KJ7 a point for the totally flat 4333 type shape. So:

♦ QJ64 (a) open 1♦ if you play a strong NT

♣ A63 (b) open 1NT if you play a weak NT.

Where did this hand come from? The Christmas 2007 edition 86 of the UK’s BRIDGE.

There are three bidding panelists, here’s what they had to say (playing a weak NoTrump):

Sally Brock: “If ever I was going to downgrade a 15-count then I would do so here (4333, no spot cards etc.)”

Julian Pottage: “… at pairs (what we play at the Pattaya bridge club) I would open a weak 1NT.”

Bernard Magee: “1NT. With a completely flat hand (4333) I generally take one point off and without a ten or nine in sight there is no reason not to. Hence I would downgrade the hand to 14 points and open a weak 1NT. Those who count losing tricks will notice that there are eight, which backs up the downgrading of the hand.”

So, pretty emphatic eh? – especially by Bernard Magee who simply repeats what Freddie North has previously stated in numerous lectures and magazines.

A note for Jean-Francois Fohrer. He made this blog entry “You have implied that Top English players would deduct ONE point for NT purposes when asked to show your evidences this is not at what they say… - NOBODY has ever mentioned ONE point”.

So here is just some more evidence that I am correct and your statement blatantly untrue, OK Vincit?? North (in other publications) and Magee are both VERY emphatic about deducting ONE point, Pottage did so by implication.

Deny a 4-card major? – part 1 Board 6 from Monday 3^rd

Very ocassionally it works out OK to deny a 4 card major (and miss a 4-4 or better fit):

Dealer: ♠ AJ2 Table A

East ♥ Q987 West North(A) East South

E-W vul ♦ K32 - - pass 1NT (1)

♣ 753 pass 3NT (2) pass pass (3)

pass

♠ Q843 N ♠ 10965

♥ 105 W E ♥ 64 Table B

♦ AQJ97 S ♦ 84 West North East South

♣ 98 ♣ KQJ102 - - - 1♥ (1)

♠ K7 pass 3♥ pass 4♥

♥ AKJ32 all pass

♦ 1065

♣ A64

Table A: (1) It’s up to you if you open these types of hand with 1♥ or 1NT. I prefer 1NT as then there’s never a rebid problem, and I hate problems.

(2) What did you bid with this North hand A in this week’s quiz? There are some who argue that with a totally flat 4333 type hand and game values you should ignore Stayman. I would only do so with points to spare and the points outside the 4-card major. So my answer to question A is 2♣.

(3) And so the 5-4! ♥ fit was missed.

Table B: (1) Most South’s chose 1♥ and then it’s impossible not to bid 4♥

And what happened? N-S at Table A have just one ♣ stop, but East has no entry provided South ducks the first round of ♣’s if one is led. What actually happened was that West led the ♠3 won by dummy’s ♠J. A ♥ to the ♥A and a ♦ to the ♦K held and declarer then claimed his 10 tricks (3 ♠’s, 5 ♥’s, 1 ♦ and 1 ♣). A lucky top for N-S as everybody else was in ♥’s making the same 10 tricks.

The bottom lines: -

- Sometimes it works to deny a 4-card major, but usually only when you have the points outside the suit.

Deny a 4-card major? – part 2 Board 12 from Monday 3^rd

But when you have oodles of points it’s another story...

Dealer: ♠ Q65 West North East South

West ♥ Q7 pass 1NT (1) pass 4♣ (2)

N-S vul ♦ A84 pass 4♠ pass 6NT (3)

♣ AK652 all pass

♠ 107 N ♠ 9842 (1) It’s minimum with no tens or intermediates,

♥ A1093 W E ♥ 842 but the 5-card suit makes it easily worth 1NT

♦ 107532 S ♦ Q9 (2) This hand is good enough to bid the small slam,

♣ 109 ♣ J743 he bid Gerber first in case partner had a

♠ AKJ3 good 14 count, there could just be two aces

♥ KJ65 missing.

♦ KJ6 But the point is, what did you bid with this South

♣ Q8 hand C in this week’s quiz? Did you try Stayman first to look for a 4-4 major suit fit or just launch into slam mode? Most did not bid Stayman, there are so many points that a possible 4-4 fit is unlikely to generate a trick and it’s best to go for the extra ten at pairs scoring.

And what happened? North turned out to have the worst hand possible for South. But the slam is still about 65%; needing either ♣’s 3-3 or the ♦ finesse. Luckily the ♦ finesse worked. Five out of nine bid 6NT making. Two stopped in 4NT and one bid 7NT.

The bottom lines: -

- With a combined 33+ and relatively flat hands it’s usually best to play in NoTrumps, especially at pairs scoring. With a 4-4 ♥ or ♠ fit there may be a better contract in 6♥/♠, but most of the time 6NT will also make and you will get a terrible score at pairs if both make.

- At teams scoring it’s different of course, and a good (with honours) 4-4 fit is usually safer.

Dave’s Column Here is Dave’s input involving the play of the hand.

North South You are North, declarer in 6♦ and East leads the ♣Q.

♠ - ♠ AK86 Plan the play.

♥ AQ1098 ♥ J

♦ A107532 ♦ Q986

♣ 103 ♣ AK65

Dave’s Column answer Board 25 from Wednesday 12^th

Dealer: ♠ - West North East South

North ♥ AQ1098 - 1♥ pass 1♠

E-W vul ♦ A107532 pass 2♦ pass 3♣

♣ 103 pass 3♦ pass 6♦

all pass

♠ Q109543 N ♠ J72

♥ 7432 W E ♥ K65 East leads the ♣Q, plan the play,

♦ - S ♦ KJ4

♣ 742 ♣ QJ98

♠ AK86

♥ J

♦ Q986

♣ AK65

This ♦ slam offers a different problem at duplicate than it does at rubber bridge. At duplicate, one must consider how many others will bid the slam and whether an overtrick will bring profit. At rubber bridge making the contract is the only consideration.

Anyway, we play duplicate. Most declarers won with dummy’s ♣A and rejected the dramatic (and fatal) play of running the ♦Q, aimed at pinning a singleton jack with East. Instead declarer led a low trump from dummy and West discarded. North won his ♦A and led another trump to East’s ♦K and when East led his ♦J declarer has severe problems. He has 4 top black suit winners , 4 trump winners and the ♥A and a ♥ ruff, totalling jus 11 tricks. For a twelfth he must risk the ♥ finesse. If he finesses against West he loses, if he takes a ruffing finesse against East he wins. It’s a toss-up.

A good rubber bridge player takes a different view. He looks for the safest way to collect 12 winners.

At trick two he ruffs a low ♠ and leads a low trump towards dummy (a safety play against KJx in either hand). If East ducks then dummy inserts the ♦8 and holds the trick. After he cashes his ♦A it’s now safe to cross-ruff for 12 sure winners.

If East takes his ♦K at trick 3, North still prevails. He can manage two ♥ ruffs without fear of an over-ruff, and when nothing bad happens in the black suits he makes his slam.

And what happened at the Pattaya Bridge Club? 6NT-3, 6♦-1 three times, 5♦-1, 5♦*=, 6♦*= well done Tomas, but he was helped when East had previously doubled a ♥ bid by North for a lead and then doubled 6♦. So declarer knew which way to take the ♥ finesse and where the ♦’s were. There were the usual few spurious results.

Dave’s 2^nd Column Here is Dave’s 2^nd input involving the play of the hand.

West East You are East, declarer in 6♥, and South leads a low ♣.

♠ KJ4 ♠ A9 You win in dummy and play the ♥9 and finesse, South

♥ Q984 ♥ AJ1072 winning with the ♥K. He leads another ♣ which you

♦ K93 ♦ AJ1084 ruff, how should declarer continue?

♣ AJ9 ♣ 4

Dave’s 2^nd Column answer Board 26 from Wednesday 12^th

Dealer: ♠ Q108632 West North East South

North ♥ 53 - - 1♥ pass

Love all ♦ 2 2NT (1) pass 3♣ (2) pass

♣ KQ76 4NT (3) pass 5♣ (4) pass

6♥ all pass

♠ KJ4 N ♠ A9

♥ Q984 W E ♥ AJ1072 (1) Jacoby 2NT

♦ K93 S ♦ AJ1084 (2) singleton (or void) ♣

♣ AJ9 ♣ 4 (3) RKCB

♠ 75 (4) 3 (or 0) keycards

♥ K6

♦ Q765 South leads a ♣ which dummy wins. West plays the ♥9 and

♣ 108532 finesses, South winning with the ♥K. South leads another ♣ which you ruff, how should declarer continue?

In an average game, East ruffs the second ♣, draws trumps, and tries to guess the ♦Q. But an expert is in no hurry to take a two-way finesse. He draws trumps and ruffs dummy’s last ♣ and next cashes the top ♠’s and ruffs a ♠.

Declarer is hoping for information – and gets it when South discards on the third ♠. Declarer then knows that North began with six ♠’s and two trumps. The ♣ suit is an unknown factor, but assuming that they split 5-4 then North can have no more than one ♦. So declarer cashes the ♦A and runs the ♦J.

And what happened at the Pattaya Bridge Club? Three pairs bid to 6♥ and only one made it. Most others were in 4♥ or 5♥ making 11 or 12 tricks.

The bottom lines

- If you have a two-way finesse, try to get a (partial) count of the hand and go with the odds.

When partner opens we all know the general basics – 1NT or a single raise = 6-9; jump raise or 2NT with +-11 etc. But when partner overcalls at the one level these responses are different. Remember, a 1-level overcall promises only about 8 points. Here are two examples from Wednesday.

Responding to partner’s overcall – part 1 Board 11 from Wednesday 12^th

Dealer: ♠ 842 Table A

South ♥ 1043 West North East South

Love all ♦ KJ9 - - - pass (1)

♣ 10875 1♦ pass 2NT (2) pass

3NT (3) all pass

♠ A63 N ♠ KQ10

♥ 985 W E ♥ QJ6 Table B

♦ AQ1082 S ♦ 653 West(B) North East(F) South

♣ A9 ♣ QJ62 - - - 1♣ (1)

♠ J975 1♦ (4) pass 1NT (5) pass

♥ AK72 pass (6) pass

♦ 74

♣ K43

Table A: (1) This South, as did most, decided to pass. Fine, so would I.

(2) This 2NT response is the standard invitational +-11 points with no 4-card major.

(3) And West has an easy accept.

Table B: (1) This South decided to open. It’s only 19 for the rule of 20 but with two 4-card majors and all of the points in the long suits I would not argue if you decided to open.

(4) A robust overcall which is fine, the alternative is 1NT.

(5) What did you bid with this East hand F in this week’s quiz? 1NT here is correct, it shows 10-12 opposite a 1-level overcall.

(6) What did you bid with this West hand B in this week’s quiz? If you understand that partner’s 1NT is 10-12 then obviously you should bid 3NT.

And what happened? 5 out of 9 E-W’s bid to 3NT but four went -1 (because of the unlucky ♦ position). So 1NT at table B making +1 scored a lucky near top.

The bottom lines: -

- 1NT by advancer opposite a 1-level overcall is 10-12 (with a stop).

All of this, plus other No Trump bids and No Trump responses when partner overcalls at the one or two level, are explained on the website:

General Bridge Topics > Responding with No trumps to partner's overcall.

Responding to partner’s overcall – part 2 Board 20 from Wednesday 12^th

Dealer: ♠ KJ103 Table A

West ♥ KQ6 West(D) North East South

Both vul ♦ A42 pass 1♣ 1♠ dbl (1)

♣ J98 3♠ (2) 3NT (3) 4♠ (4) pass

pass dbl all pass

♠ Q94 N ♠ A8752

♥ 74 W E ♥ AJ9 Table B

♦ Q10765 S ♦ K9 West(D) North East South

♣ KQ7 ♣ 652 pass 1♣ 1♠ dbl (1)

♠ 6 2♠ (2) all pass

♥ 108532

♦ J83

♣ A1043

Table A: (1) promising 6+ points and 4+ ♥’s. With shortage in RHO’s suit and a 5-card ♥ suit this is clearly a good bid.

(2) What did you bid with this West hand D in this week’s quiz? I understand that this West intended it as an invitational raise. I play that 2♣ (or 2♥) here as the invitational raise and 3♠ weak with long ♠’s. But that is not really the issue because the correct bid is that chosen at table B.

(3) Ludicrous of course on a possible combined 20 count.

(4) East should pass of course, but he thought that North had his bid (he is usually a sound bidder) and he thought that partner had a weak hand with 4+ ♠’s.

Table B: (2) This is the correct answer to question D.

And what happened? 4♠* went -2 for a joint bottom to E-W. 2♠ making by E-W was the popular result.

The bottom lines: -

- When partner overcalls say 1♠, then with 6-9/10 and three card support raise to 2♠. Both 3♠ and 4♠ are pre-emptive and with a good raise to 3♠ or more cue bid the opponent’s suit, this allows the contract to stay at the two level should partner have a minimal 8 point or so overcall.

All of this is explained on the website:

Conventions > The Unassuming Cue Bid.

Bidding Quiz Answers

Hand A: 2♣, Stayman. I would like much better ♣’s before I decide not to look for a ♥ fit.

Hand B: 3NT. Partner’s 1NT is 10-12 with a ♣ stop and your hand warrants a shot at game.

Hand C: 6NT (or 4♣ if partner is in the habit of opening 1NT with a good 14 count). With so many points I would not look for a 4-4 major suit fit at pairs scoring.

Hand D: 2♠. Any invitational bid is an overbid and you do not have enough ♠’s for a pre-emptive 3♠ or 4♠.

Hand E: (a) 1♦, it’s not good enough for a strong 1NT

(b) 1NT – deduct a point for the 4333 type shape.

Hand F: 1NT. Partner’s overcall could be a low as 7-8 points and so 1NT is quite sufficient. 1NT opposite a 1-level overcall shows 10-12 points and 2NT is 13-14.