Niemeijer
     
 
to conventions this page was last updated: 11-Feb-2006
 
     
 
If you wish you can view the pdf file or download the Word Doc file for viewing or printing.
 
     
     
     
 

Niemeijer - responding to partner's 2NT opening.

 
  There are in fact many variations on the Neimeijer scheme of responding to 2NT and I give a fairly basic but very good one here.  
     
 
3♣ Puppet Stayman , asks for 4 and 5 card majors, reply is as follows: -
   
 
a)

3♦ :

no 5 card major, but 4 ♥ 's and/or 4 ♠ 's.
     
   

The 3♣ bidder then shows his major suit holding as follows: -

     
   
3♥ shows 4 ♠'s * note 1
3♠ shows 4 ♥'s * note 1
3NT shows no 4 card major, and is to play * note 2
4♣ shows both majors and interest in slam  
4♦ shows both majors and no slam interest  
     
   
Note 1: These responses allow opener to be declarer.
Note 2: The 3♣ bidder may have gone this route because the direct 3NT bid is needed conventionally. Alternatively, he may have a 3 card major and a weak doubleton elsewhere and was hoping to find the 5-3 major suit fit.
 
     
b)

3♥/♠ :

5 card suit.
     
c)

3NT:

no 4 or 5 card major.
   
   
3♦

Transfer to 3♥

   
3♥ Transfer to 3♠
   
3♠ Minor suit Stayman or a transfer to 4♣. But the best treatment is probably a puppet to 3NT to describe a minor-suited hand as described in the 3♠ over 2NT page. Up to you.
   
3NT shows 5 ♠'s and 4 ♥ 's (there is not enough room to show this with a transfer sequence).
 

Note that if 3♣ were ‘normal' Stayman then you could bid 3♣ followed by 3♥/♠ to show 5-4 or 4-5 in the majors after a 3♦ response, but when playing Puppet Stayman that is no longer possible. With 5 ♥'s and 4 ♠'s you simply bid 3♦ to transfer into ♥ 's and then bid 3♠ of course.

   
4♣ Gerber
   
etc... where it's up to you what the higher bids mean and some players
  prefer 4♣ as a transfer to 4♦.
 
 
     
 
  Pattaya Bridge Club - www.pattayabridge.com
 
     
 
to conventions