Our website is www.pattayabridge.com Club News Sheet – No. 324

Our blogsite is www.pattayabridge.wordpress.com

My home phone is 038 422924 and my mobile number is 083 6066880 25^th Jan 2009

It is best to use my home number to contact me unless I am at the bridge club.

My e-mail is terry@pattayabridge.com or pattayabridge@yahoo.com

My MSN messenger ID is tj_quested@hotmail.com

	to news-sheet main page
	to Pattaya Bridge home page
	to bridge book reviews	to bridge conventions	to No Trump bidding
	to bridge CD's and computer games and software

Mon 19^th N-S 1^st Gun & Lennart 54% 2^nd Jeremy & Sally 53%

E-W 1^st Dave & Janne 61% 2^nd Kenneth & Ursula 59%

Wed 21^st N-S 1^st Jooleinn & Aaiur 63% 2^nd Hans V & Margareta 62%

E-W 1^st Lewis & Paul Q 61% 2^nd Bob S & Johan 57%

Fri 23^rd N-S 1^st Janne & Lars B 60% 2^nd Dave & Royd 58%

E-W 1^st Hans & Sally 59% 2^nd Bob P & Olaf 58%

Bidding Quiz Standard American bidding is assumed unless otherwise stated.

Hand A Hand B What do you open with Hand A?

♠ A1072 ♠ 8753

♥ Q8 ♥ KQ7 With Hand B LHO opens 1♥ and partner overcalls 1♠, what

♦ AKJ106 ♦ A do you bid?

♣ 87 ♣ 8764

Hand C Hand D What do you open with Hand C?

♠ AK ♠ A43

♥ AKQ10754 ♥ J6 With Hand D partner opens 1♦, what do you bid?

♦ - ♦ 9642

♣ Q942 ♣ KQ107

Bidding Sequence Quiz

E 1♦ pass 1♠ pass Is 2♥ weak, invitational or forcing?

1NT pass 2♥

F 1♦ pass 1♠ pass Is 2♥ weak, invitational or forcing?

2♦ pass 2♥

We already have 7 players with qualifying results for the Bronze Medal. I’m sure that nobody will be surprised to see Hans and Janne right up there at the top.

	Gold Cup = Best 30	Silver Plate = Best 10	Bronze Medal = Best 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7			317.3 Hans Vikman 309.9 Janne Roos 296.5 Bob Short 293.5 Lewis Berg 293.5 Paul Quodomine 292.7 Sally Watson 290.1 Johan Bratsberg

Two Losers Board 19 from Monday 19^th

Dealer: ♠ AK Table A

North ♥ AKQ10754 West North(C) East South

E-W vul ♦ - - 1♥ (1) pass 1♠

♣ Q942 pass 3♣ (2) pass 3♠

pass 4♥ pass pass (3)

♠ 10984 N ♠ 7 all pass

♥ 98 W E ♥ 63

♦ AJ543 S ♦ Q98762 Table B

♣ K10 ♣ J653 West North(C) East South

♠ QJ6532 - 2♣ (1) pass 2♦ (2)

♥ J2 pass 2♥ pass 2♠

♦ K10 pass 3♥ etc. to 6♥ or 7♥

♣ A87

Table A: (1) What did you open with this North hand C in this week’s quiz? This hand has 10 playing tricks, or just two losers if you are a believer in the Losing trick Count. Either way, with 18 HCP a 1♥ opening does not do this hand justice.

(2) 2^nd suit and game forcing.

(3) Maybe South should press on, but I don’t think so.

Table B: (1) Most North’s opened this hand 2♣ (or 2♦ if playing Benjamin twos).

(2) And slam is easily reached whatever you play over your 2♣ opening.

And what happened? 7♥= twice, 6♥+1 three times and 4♥+3 twice.

The bottom lines: -

- I am not a great fan of opening 2♣ with 9 playing tricks and 15 or so points, but 10 playing tricks in a major and 18 HCP is surely worth your strongest bid in any system?

Upgrade to 1NT? Board 18 from Wednesday 21^st

Dealer: ♠ A1072 Table A

East ♥ Q8 West North(A) East South

N-S vul ♦ AKJ106 - - pass pass

♣ 87 pass 1♦ (1) pass 1♥

pass 1♠ pass 1NT

♠ Q943 N ♠ J85 pass pass (2) pass

♥ 10632 W E ♥ A74

♦ 82 S ♦ 854 Table B

♣ KQ6 ♣ A943 West North(A) East South

♠ K6 - - pass pass

♥ KJ95 pass 1NT (1) pass 2♣

♦ Q73 pass 2♠ pass 3NT

♣ J1052 all pass

Table A: (1) What did you open with this North hand A in this week’s quiz? This ‘obvious?’ 1♦ opening was chosen by all but one North.

(2) All but one of the 1♦ openers passed here and the other chose 2♦. I guess you could bid 2NT if you realize how strong this hand is, but 2NT may be too high.

Table B: (2) This North, however, has strong feelings about hand evaluation. This hand is NOT 14 points – with two tens and a huge 5-card suit it’s more like 16 and he correctly (in my biased opinion) opened 1NT.

And what happened? 3NT is easy and actually made +2 on poor defence. Everybody else missed the game as it’s not possible to later safely show a balanced 16 count when you open it 1♦ (you would later have to bid 2NT at some stage which may be too high).

The bottom lines: -

- 2245 type shape (the 5-carder not a major) is balanced enough for a 1NT opening.

- Add on a point for two tens.

- AKJ10x is NOT 8 points – it is more like 9 or 10.

- One player pointed out that opening 1NT will work badly if partner has 4 ♠’s but not enough to respond to 1NT (i.e 6 or 7 points). Then you miss the ♠ fit. This is true, but it is also true for any 1NT opener that contains a 4-card major and in my opinion it’s more important to show the strength of your hand with the opening bid than to lie about the strength in order to possibly get to a superior major suit partscore if partner just happens to have exactly 6/7 points and also 4 cards in your major.

- The same player suggested that the auction could go 1♦ - 1♥ - 1♠ - 1NT - 2NT - 3NT. I would expect a more shapely hand (say 4162). I consider 4252 OK for a 1NT opening.

- The main problem with 1♦ - 1♥ - 1♠ - 1NT - 2NT is that responder may well have just 6-7 points and 2NT may go one down, so it’s far better to simply open 1NT. This 2NT bid should have the same range as in 1♦ - 1NT - 2NT. i.e. a good 16-18.

- Hand evaluation is NOT just adding points. Obviously devalue for 4333 but conversely add on for tens, intermediates and for good 5-card suits.

- The argument for opening 1♦ rather than 1NT seems to be that you miss a ♠ partscore when partner has 4 ♠’s and 6-7 points. But look at it the other way round – partner has 4 ♥’s and 6-7 points. Then the bidding goes 1♦ - 1♥ - 1♠ - 1NT - 2NT - pass and you may well go down. If you do not bid 2NT but pass 1NT then you may miss game (as here). Partner having 4 ♥’s is much more likely than him having 4 ♠’s. Q.E.D

An Unassuming Cue bid Board 26 from Wednesday 21^st

Dealer: ♠ 8753 Table A

East ♥ KQ7 West North(B) East South

both vul ♦ A - - 1♥ 1♠

♣ 8764 pass 3♠ (1) pass pass (2)

all pass

♠ 1096 N ♠ 2

♥ 94 W E ♥ A10853 Table B

♦ Q98642 S ♦ KJ7 West North(B) East South

♣ K10 ♣ AJ95 - - 1♥ 1♠

♠ AKQJ4 pass 2♥ (1) pass 3♠

♥ J62 pass 4♠ all pass

♦ 1053

♣ 32

Table A: (1) What did you bid with this North hand B in this week’s quiz? The hand is worth an invitational raise to 3♠ but a direct 3♠ is best played as pre-emptive.

(2) And South has no reason to press on opposite a pre-emptive raise.

Table B: (1) This North, however, knows about the Unassuming Cue Bid. Actually 3♥ is the best bid here – a jump unassuming cue bid showing 4-card support, but North suspected that his partner would not understand this and so hoped that partner understood the normal USB.

And what happened? Only two pairs reached 4♠ which is an easy make. Unfortunately one of the declarers drew trumps immediately and then discovered that he had only one trump left in dummy to trump two losing ♦’s! So one down in a cold game. Obviously declarer should cash the ♦A and ruff 2 ♦’s before completely drawing trumps, if you draw two rounds of trumps immediately you have no entry for the ♦ ruffs and West will draw a 3^rd round of trumps. 3♠+1 was the most popular spot.

The bottom lines: -

- If you need to ruff two losers in dummy, then you need two trumps there in order to do that!

- The Unassuming Cue Bid is a bid of opener’s suit after partner has overcalled and shows a sound raise to the three level or better.

- An improvement use by some experts is that a jump USB again shows a sound raise to the three level or better but guarantees 4 trumps. This is sound if you are an advocate of the Law of Total Tricks (as I am of course).

Raising Partner’s minor Board 17 from Wednesday 21^st

Dealer: ♠ Q5 Table A

North ♥ K952 West North East(D) South

Love all ♦ KQ107 - pass pass pass

♣ J42 1♦ (1) pass 3♦ (2) all pass

♠ K1062 N ♠ A43 Table B

♥ A84 W E ♥ J6 West North East(D) South

♦ AJ8 S ♦ 9642 - pass pass pass

♣ 865 ♣ KQ107 1♦ (1) pass 1NT (2) all pass

♠ J987

♥ Q1073

♦ 53

♣ A93

Table A: (1) Playing Better Minor. I personally would open 1♣ (as mentioned last week) but I prefer to play a short club anyway when 1♦ would promise 4 ♦’s.

(2) What did you bid with this East hand D in this week’s quiz? This pair play 3♦ as a limit raise and I don’t like it at all: -

(a) because the pair are playing better minor and 1♦ may be just 3 cards.

(b) It’s not good enough! You need 11-12.

Table B: (2) This pair also play better minor and East got it right. Playing a short club (where 1♦ promises 4 ♦’s) then 2♦ would be a reasonable alternative.

And what happened? 3♦ was too high, West at table B is a good declarer and he managed just -1 for a just below average score. 1NT by East made exactly for a near top.

The bottom lines: -

- If you play better minor then you need 5-card support to raise partner’s 1♣/♦ opening.

- If you play a short ♣ then you need 5 ♣’s but can raise ♦’s with just four.

- There are two schools of thought on what to open with two 3-card minors when playing Better Minor. Some open the better. I will always open 1♣ and so only open 1♦ with 3 cards when exactly 4432. But I prefer to play a short ♣ when 1♦ is always 4 cards.

Dave’s Column Here is Dave’s first input, a defensive problem.

♠ 864 N

♥ A1093 W E West North East South

♦ A10 S - - - 1♣

♣ A763 pass 1♦ pass 1♥

♠ 753 pass 1♠ pass 2♣

♥ KQ72 pass 2NT pass 3NT

♦ K all pass

♣ KQJ109

You are West, defending against 3NT. Partner leads the ♦9 and you take dummy’s ♦K with the ♦A. Do you return a ♦ or consider a switch?

If you decide to switch would you lead up to dummy’s weakness (♠’s) or dummy’s strength (♥’s)?

Dave’s Column answer Board 19 from Wednesday 21^st

Dealer: ♠ AKJ10 West North East South

South ♥ 84 - - - 1♣

E-W vul ♦ QJ65 pass 1♦ pass 1♥

♣ 852 pass 1♠ (1) pass 2♣

pass 2NT pass 3NT

♠ 864 N ♠ Q92 all pass

♥ A1093 W E ♥ J65

♦ A10 S ♦ 987432 (1) Natural and forcing, most play 2♠ here

♣ A763 ♣ 4 as 4^th suit forcing.

♠ 753

♥ KQ72

♦ K

♣ KQJ109

You are West and have three options after winning the first trick with the ♦A.

Given the bidding and the lead of the nine, partner has nothing in ♦’s and very little outside.

With a ♦ return eliminated, should West switch to ♥’s or ♠’s? While it’s tempting to lead up to dummy’s weakness West must take time to work out where the real threat is.

In this layout, dummy’s ♣’s are the most serious threat. North’s bidding promises no more than 4 ♠’s and his failure to leap to game suggests that he is probably missing a ♠ honour. Therefore, if West leads a ♠ he is giving North time to develop the ♣ winners.

If West leads a ♠, North wins and establishes the ♣’s. When East holds up, declarer can reach the established ♣’s with one of the ♥ honours.

To defeat the game, West must cut North’s communications to dummy by shifting to a low ♥. When East’s ♥J forces out one of dummy’s ♥ honours, West can hold up twice in ♣’s making it impossible for declarer to get more than two ♣ tricks and the contract goes one down.

And what happened at the Pattaya Bridge Club? Just two N-S pairs were in 3NT; one made and the other went -1. Other results were all over the place and at my table South elected to pass (!) and played in 2♣+1 for about average.

The bottom lines: -

- Knowing it’s time to switch is not enough, one must also choose the right target.

- When dummy has a good long suit missing an honour or two, consider knocking out the side entries.

Dave’s 2^nd Column Here is Dave’s 2^nd input involving the play of the hand.

West East You are East, declarer in 3NT. South leads the ♣5 and North

♠ A3 ♠ J10652 plays the ♣K which you take with the ♣A. You can expect 12

♥ K104 ♥ AQ32 tricks with friendly breaks in both red suits, but how do you

♦ KQ9862 ♦ A5 play on the assumption that breaks are bad?

♣ 96 ♣ A7

Dave’s 2^nd Column answer Board 20 from Wednesday 21st

Dealer: ♠ KQ7 West North East South

West ♥ J7 1♦ pass 1♠ pass

Both vul ♦ J1043 2♦ pass 2♥ (1) pass

♣ KJ42 3♦ pass 3NT all pass

♠ A3 N ♠ J10652 (1) I guess you have to agree about this one.

♥ K104 W E ♥ AQ32 At our table they bid 3♥ which is clearly

♦ KQ9862 S ♦ A5 forcing. A simple 2♥ is considered as

♣ 96 ♣ A7 just ‘constructive’ by some.

♠ 984

♥ 9865

♦ 7

♣ Q10853

East cashed the ♦A at trick two and led another ♦ and that was curtains when South discarded a ♠. Declarer took the ♦KQ but could not afford to establish the long ♦ since the defence would run too many ♣’s. So declarer took the ♥AK and led a ♥ to dummy’s ♥10 but he could not get back to the ♥Q. The ♠A won the last trick, one down.

The correct technique is for declarer to test the ♥’s at trick two by cashing the ♥K and ♥A. When North’s ♥J falls East leads to the ♥10, returns to ♦A and cashes the ♥Q. Declarer can then try to run the ♦’s but is assured of 9 tricks when they do not break.

And what happened at the Pattaya Bridge Club? Six out of nine pairs reached 3NT and just one went down.

Double 3NT for a lead Board 22 from Monday 19^th

Dealer: ♠ Q1032 West North East South

East ♥ 3 - - 1♦ pass

E-W vul ♦ Q97 2♣ pass 2NT pass

♣ KQJ64 3NT dbl (1) all pass

♠ 976 N ♠ AK4 (1) This double, after a freely bid 3NT in an

♥ KJ5 W E ♥ Q1084 uninterrupted auction, asks partner to lead

♦ A104 S ♦ K865 dummy’s first bid suit. If West was a passed

♣ A1082 ♣ 95 hand initially then this would be a great bid,

♠ J85 but in this actual auction West is unlimited

♥ A9762 and so it’s a bit dangerous. Nether the less,

♦ J32 two North’s did find the bid on Monday.

♣ 73

And what happened? South dutifully led a ♣ and 3NT* went -1 on both occasions. Three other pairs ended up in 3NT undoubled; -1, = and +1.

The bottom lines: -

- In an uncontested auction in which the opponents freely bid to 3NT, a double by the opponent not on lead asks partner to lead dummy’s first bid suit.

Double Stayman for a lead Board 23 from Friday 19^th

A double of a cipher bid (e.g. Stayman or a transfer) asks for that suit to be led. Unfortunately for North, the Rueful Rabbit was sitting West.

Dealer: ♠ J1064 West(RR) North East South

West ♥ K4 pass (1) pass 1NT pass

both vul ♦ 873 2♣ (2) dbl (3) redbl pass

♣ AJ42 pass (4) pass

♠ A98 N ♠ KQ (1) The Rueful Rabbit (RR) looked at the

♥ J986 W E ♥ A75 very flat 3423 shape and decided that

♦ KJ S ♦ A1094 it was not worth an opener.

♣ K105 ♣ Q873 (2) Stayman, pretty clear with these cards.

♠ 7532 It was only after this bid that a kibitzer

♥ 1032 suggest that RR should count his cards,

♦ Q652 RR gave bit of a start as the ♥Q appeared

♣ 96 out from behind the ♥J.

(3) Asking for a ♣ lead, but it can be dangerous with a suit of this length and quality.

(4) At this stage RR surreptitiously removed his bidding box to below the table to check on the score for 2♣ redoubled with an overtrick or two. It was good enough to pass.

And what happened? North had a long think, but the RR had fixed him and there was nothing to be done; the contract made +2 and so 1560 away. The bottom lines: -

- It’s usually a good idea to count your cards and check that the distribution you are looking at adds up to 13, but sometimes you luck out.

- A double of Stayman asks for a ♣ lead and ♣AJxx may possibly be good enough (I would like more) if RHO is a passed hand; of course if RHO had actually passed with a full opener…

Bidding Quiz Answers

Hand A: 1NT. 2245 type shape is OK for a NoTrump opening (the 5-carder not a major) and with two tens and a great 5-card suit this hand is easily strong enough for a strong 1NT opener. Also, Qx is usually a holding that belongs in declarer’s hand.

Hand B: 2♥. An Unassuming Cue Bid showing a sound raise to 3♠. A direct 2♠ or 3♠ are wrong as they are both generally played as pre-emptive. Actually, there is an improvement on 2♥, and that is 3♥ assuming that you have agreed with partner that the jump Unassuming Cue Bid shows 4-card support.

Hand C: 2♣, or 2♦ if you play Benjamin twos. This two loser hand with 10 playing tricks is easily worth your strongest bid.

Hand D: 1NT, it’s not good enough for 2NT and you cannot raise ♦’s with just 4 cards if playing Better Minor.

Bidding Sequence Answers

E 1♦ pass 1♠ pass 2♥ here is weak, opener should normally pass or correct.

1NT pass 2♥

F 1♦ pass 1♠ pass This is up to your partnership. It is generally played as

2♦ pass 2♥ forcing but some play it as constructive (invitational).